Cases

KELLY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The district court initially intended to give DeMarrias two years of supervised release but, after reading the report of a psychological evaluation, instead sentenced him to supervised release for life. Reading the same report, I cannot construe it to justify a lifetime of punishment, and therefore respectfully dissent. The law is clear: supervised release is a form of punishment.

713 F.Supp. 346 (1989) Lisa Carrion DeMARRIAS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 88-1018. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, N.D. April 29, 1989. Robert Mines, Hot Springs, S.D., for plaintiff. David L. Zuercher, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pierre, S.D., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION DONALD J. PORTER, Ch

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Douglas Demarrias appeals from his conviction on four counts of abusive sexual contact with his fourteen year old stepdaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(1) and (3). Demarrias contends that the district court 1 was without jurisdiction to try and sentence him for these offenses. He al

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. In a petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Peter Kenneth DeMarrias seeks to vacate a ten-year sentence that he is now serving for voluntary manslaughter, a lesser included offense in the indictment for second degree murder brought against DeMarrias. The district court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. On this appeal, we consider a sequel to DeMarrias v. United States, 444 F.2d 162 (8th Cir.1971) (DeMarrias I). Peter Kenneth DeMarrias, an enrolled Indian who resided upon the Sisseton-Wah-peton Indian Reservation of South Dakota, was convicted by a jury of second degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 115

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge. This is a timely appeal by defendant DeMarrias .from his conviction on a plea of nolo contendere to the crime of involuntary manslaughter committed in Indian country in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1153 and 1112. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the manslaughter indictment upon the ground that the prosecution of the action

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Peter Kenneth De-Marrias, appeals from the denial, by the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, of his motion for vacation of sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. His appeal raises the question of the proper procedure to be followed by a Distr

421 U.S. 934 95 S.Ct. 1664 44 L.Ed.2d 93 Donald DEMARRIASv.Mary POITRA, as mother and surviving parent of Richard A. Primeaux. No. 74-783. Supreme Court of the United States April 21, 1975 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Ap

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1515 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. EDWIN OTERO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. District Judge] Before

Supreme Court of South Dakota. Certiorari denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2284 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Edgar T. Pratt

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1308 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Charles Matthew Carrington, also known as Charles Matthew Carrington, Jr.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2168 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adam James Rollins Defendan

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2901 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Anthony Lemicy

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1647 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dewey Dean Miller Defenda

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1490 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Meamen Jean Nyah D

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2626 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Levi Shelby Roe Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 20-2627 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1172 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. David E. Clark Defenda

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Michael J. GONZALES, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 18-0347 Crim. App. No. 20130849 Argued April 23,