Cases

93 F.Supp.2d 73 (2000) John D. HALL, et al., Plaintiff v. MAINE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH TRUST, Defendant Civil No. 99-CV-208-B. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 15, 2000. Peter L. Thompson, Law Offices of Ronald Coles, Kennebunk, ME, Joseph P Ditre, Consumer Health Law Program, Augusta, ME, for plaintiffs. Charles A. Harvey, Jr., Harvey &

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anita Florio, J.), entered November 14, 1985, which denied plaintiff-appellant Bolt Associates’ motion to stay prosecution of defendant-respondent’s first counterclaim and direct arbitration thereof, unanimously reversed, on the law, the complaint is dismissed as premature and the counterclaim is dismissed in view of the arbitration provision, without costs. Plaintiff-appellant Bolt Associates (Bolt

TYSON, Judge. The indictment charges the appellant with possessing'or transporting marijuana, and also possessing or transporting lysergic acid dielhylaminde (LSD-25), contrary to the law. Verdict and judgment of guilty were entered for possessing or transporting lysergic acid dielhylaminde, which resulted in a sentence of eight years in the penitentiary. On the night of July 16, 1970, Officers Baxter and

DOBIE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to review a decision of the Tax Court of the United States that petitioner, O’Kelly W. Myers, for the year 1943, was not entitled to the benefits of Section 116(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 116(a), which grants an exemption from federal taxation of earned income received f

BROWN, District Judge. Several questions arise on the face of the pleadings in this case, most all of which have been determined by abundant authority. It may be said, and it is probably true, that section 2339 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (1878), concerning the vested rights to the use of water for mining, right of way for canals, etc., passed July 26, 1866, has not been put in force and is not in force in Alaska