Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Drago”
United States v. Drago Carl Musapublic domain
FISHER, Circuit Judge: While on supervised release following convictions on three counts of bank fraud, appellant Drago Carl Musa (“Musa”) was convicted of misdemeanor witness intimidation in violation of California Penal Code § 136.1(b)(1). Based on that conviction, the United States Probation Office (“USPO”) sought to revoke Musa’s supervised release. At the outset of the re
United States v. Dragopublic domain
49 F.3d 732 U.S.v.Drago*** NO. 94-2338 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Mar 02, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Fla., No. 93-01048-GCR-1 1 AFFIRMED.
Drago v. Jonespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Drago v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Drago v. Floridapublic domain
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Drago v. Floridapublic domain
537 U.S. 1117 DRAGOv.FLORIDA. No. 02-6993. Supreme Court of United States. January 13, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT. 2 Dist
State v. Dragopublic domain
Lisa P. Page, Presiding Judge Following trial, Anthony Drago (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment entered upon a conviction of one count of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067 (RSMo Cum. Sup. 2012). Defendant contends the trial court: (I) erred in denying him the opportunity to present facts surrounding his polygraph exam; and (II and III) plainly erred in failing to sua sponte issue curative instructions or st
Hammer v. Drago (In Re Hammer)public domain
112 B.R. 341 (1990) In re Brian D. HAMMER, Debtor. Brian D. HAMMER, Appellant, v. Michael DRAGO and Ed Summers, Appellees. BAP No. NC-89-1864-AsRO, Bankruptcy No. 486-04397 CN, Adv. No. 487-0004 AC. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 15, 1990. Decided April 10, 1990.
Drago v. GARMENTpublic domain
691 F.Supp.2d 490 (2010) Stephen DRAGO, Individually and as acting Chair and President of "Neighborhoods Against Cell Towers," Plaintiff, v. John S. GARMENT, Chairman, and Stephen A. Alexander, John E. Durante, Casimiro V. Cibelli, Arnold Bernstein, Michael F. Quinn, and John J. Ioris, as Members of the Planning Board of the City of White Plains; The City of White Plains, New York, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, Defendants. No.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Gary Wychepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 18, 2013 Decided January 31, 2014 No. 12-3034 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. GARY WYCHE, ALSO KNOWN AS GARY GUNTER, ALSO KNOWN AS DRAGO, APPELLANT Consolidated with 12-3058 Appeals from the United States District Court
Butt v. United Statespublic domain
714 F.Supp.2d 217 (2010) Saquib Basheer BUTT, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-12004-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 27, 2010. *218 Anthony Drago, Jr., Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. Anita Johnson, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for Defendant. <
Drago v. Ohiopublic domain
Ct. App. Ohio, Cuya-hoga County. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago Sudarpublic domain
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge: Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Lju-bas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago Sudar appeal from judgments of conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a trial before Chief Judge Motley and a jury. Appellants urge reversal, relying not only o
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Ollie Deville appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to set aside the settlement of his medical malpractice suit and the district court’s grant of the defendants’ motion to enforce that settlement. Deville argues that he was coerced to settle. Finding no merit in Deville’s argument, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS In an a
Robert Drago v. Ken Jennepublic domain
COX, Circuit Judge: Robert Drago appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Broward County Sheriffs Office and Sheriff Ken Jenne (collectively, BSO) on Drago’s claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and th
United States v. Musapublic domain
MEMORANDUM** In August 2001, we remanded Drago Carl Musa’s case to the district court with instructions that it hold a hearing on an alleged communication breakdown between Musa and his attorney at Musa’s revocation hearing. During the interval between our submission of Musa’s case and our remand to the district court, Musa completed his term of supervised release. In light of this changed circumstance, the
Drago v. Holiday Isle, L.L.C.public domain
(2007) Arthur DRAGO and Kathy Drago, Plaintiffs, v. HOLIDAY ISLE, L.L.C. and The Mitchell Company, Inc., its manager and sole member, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0430-KD-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 7, 2007. ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on pla
United States v. Musapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** It is well-established that the Sixth Amendment guarantees representation at a combined parole revocation and sentencing hearing. Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 134, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967). Although both Garcia and DeVito were present at the October 2, 2000 hearing, neither appeared in the capacity of trial counsel for Musa. Garcia had served as Musa’s counsel at hearings