Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1496, 23-1497 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOEL DUDLEY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and BAKER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Joseph W. DUDLEY, Jr. Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. M

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After two separate jury trials, Defendant-Appellant Joel Dudley (Dudley) was convicted of one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 2256(8)(A), and one count of false declaration before the court, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a). On appeal, Dudley contests the denial of his motion to suppress in the

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sean Lamont Dudley seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis, as well as its order denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dorsey Domanta Dudley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cour

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony D. Dudley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A cer

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sean Lamont Dudley seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief of judgment as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and denying it on its merits. Because Dudley’s motion was a successive and unauthorized § 225

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants Vielka Dudley (Dudley) and Antonio Scott (Scott) appeal their respective sentences based on their convictions as co-conspirators in a cocaine distribution ring run by Marcos Anderson (Anderson).1 See United States v. Anderson, 39 F.3d 331, 352 (D.C.Cir.1994), vacated in part on other ground, 59 F.3d 1323 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc),

97 F.3d 1467 U.S.v.Dudley* NO. 95-7010 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 13, 1996 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala., No. 89-00106-CR-PT-S 2

PER CURIAM: ■ This case involves an armed robbery of a Tuscaloosa, Alabama, bank. Appellants Charles Roderick Wilson (‘Wilson”), Kenneth P. Dudley (“Dudley”) and John Perkins (“Perkins”) (collectively “the defendants”) were charged in a multi-count federal indictment. Wilson and Dudley were charged in Count One with armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d);

DeCICCO, Judge: In this appeal, we hold that a military suspect’s admission of a crime to a military physician was admissible at trial when the physician’s questions were for diagnostic purposes. This holding applies even though the physician was aware of the individual’s status as a suspect and did not provide appropriate rights warnings. We have also concluded that we are satisfied of the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasona

854 F.Supp. 570 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Larry Mitchell DUDLEY, Susan Hope Dudley, Defendants. No. IP 93-141-CR. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. May 9, 1994. *571 Mark Inman, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff. *572 Susan E. Dowd, As

19 F.3d 14 U.S.v.Dudley NO. 93-08345 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 07, 1994 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED.

OPINION OF THE COURT LEONARD, Senior Judge: Consistent with his pleas, appellant was convicted by special court-martial of wrongfully using marijuana. He was sentenced by officer members to be reduced in grade to E-l and to be discharged with a bad-conduct discharge. On appeal he requests sentence relief, asserting that the military judge improperly admitted Prosecution Exhibit 4 for consideration on sentence. <

959 F.2d 966 U.S.v.Dudley NO. 90-8709 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 24, 1992 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED IN PART.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAFFELS, District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant Larry L. Dudley’s motion to dismiss Counts Three through Six of the twelve count indictment. On June 3, 1991, the court held this motion in abeyance pending a ruling on the defendant's mental competency. On November 18, 1991, the court ruled the defendant is competent to stand trial. The court is now prepared to

940 F.2d 1542 U.S.v.Dudley* NO. 90-8533 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUL 16, 1991 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

907 F.2d 1143 U.S.v.Dudley* ** NO. 89-7609 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUN 04, 1990 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

USCA11 Case: 19-10267 Date Filed: 07/22/2021 Page: 1 of 58 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10267 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 7:18-cr-00066-