Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Duran-Rodriguez”
Rodriguez-Duran v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rodriguez-Duran v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
United States v. Rodriguez-Duranpublic domain
507 F.3d 749 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Alcides RODRÍGUEZ-DURÁN, et al. Defendants, Appellants. Nos. 06-1400, 06-1401, 06-1402, 06-1403, 06-1404, 06-1405, 06-1406, 06-1407, 06-1408. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 5, 2007. Decided November 21, 2007. *750
Jose Duran-Rodriguez v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE JESUS DURAN- No. 16-72957 RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, Agency No. A093-457-361 v. William P. Barr, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Imm
Rodriguez-Duran v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Juan De Dios Rodriguez-Duran petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance without opinion of the Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal due to his 1992 aggravated felony conviction under California Penal Code section 288(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and we deny the petition. The doctrine
United States v. Paganpublic domain
286 F.Supp.2d 231 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis Mercado PAGAN, Sylvia Rodriguez Duran, Defendants. No. CRIM. 02-247(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 2, 2003. *232 Lynn M. Doble-Salicrup, United State Attorney's Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Juan R. Acevedo-Cruz, Artur
Sanchez-Pena v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Lujano-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Lujano-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Castillo-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (67 Fed. Appx. 246); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 247); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 920);
Castillo-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (67 Fed. Appx. 246); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 247); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 920);
Castillo-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
539 U.S. 966 Castillo-Perezv.United StatesDuran-Rivasv.United StatesGabarete-Guardadov.United StatesGuillen-Segurav.United StatesHernandez-Santiagov.United StatesIraheta-Barrera, aka Diaz-Hernandezv.United StatesJimenez-Aguilerav.United StatesLanza-Chanv.United StatesLopez-Guzmanv.United StatesLopez-Salasv.United StatesOrtiz-Zacar
United States v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Case: 24-40031 Document: 97-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 29, 2025 No. 24-40031 ___
United States v. Harperpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-5091 Document: 96-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH October 3, 2024
United States v. Ochspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action No. 21-00073 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell NICHOLAS DECARLO and NICHOLAS OCHS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 9, 2022, defendants
United States v. Pizarro-Mercadopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1208, 23-1211 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JAIRO HUERTAS-MERCADO; ERICK PIZARRO-MERCADO, Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
Castillo v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 16-1624L; 17-1931L; 17-468L; 17-4680L Filed: March 1, 2023 * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * REINALDO CASTILLO, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * v. * * UNITED STATES, *
United States v. Herrerapublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-2126 Document: 010110759758 Date Filed: 10/27/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 27, 2022