Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 23cr0073-13 (CKK) ANDRE MALIK EDMOND, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (uly {4_, 2024) This matter is set for sentencing on July 22, 2024. On February 28, 2024, Defendant entered into a plea agreement on Count One of the Fourth Superseding Indictment, charging him with Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute 400 Grams or More of a Mixture or Substance Con

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. Action No. 89-162 (EGS) RAYFUL EDMOND, III, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction In 1990, Defendant Rayful Edmond, III (“Mr. Edmond”) was sentenced to life in prison after a jury convicted him on various charges stemming from his leading role in a large-sca

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, K.J. BRUBAKER, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK G. EDMOND MIDSHIPMAN THIRD CLASS (MIDN 3/C), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 20120016

ORDER A jury found Tralvis Edmond guilty of possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and possession of heroin with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Prior felony convictions for robbery, battery, and distribution of heroin made Edmond a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(a), and the district court calculated a guidelines imprisonment range of 210 to 262 months. Both parties urged the district cou

PER CURIAM: * Paul Edmond, III, federal prisoner # 12698-035, appeals the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based upon the amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines that implemented the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) of 2010. He also appeals the district court’s denial of his subsequent “objection” to the denial of a sentence reduction and his motion for lea

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. 1 Staff Sergeant Stanley E. Edmond was tried at a general court-martial by a panel of officer and enlisted members. He was convicted of conspiracy to commit larceny, absence without leave, false official s

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3022 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for

29 F.Supp.2d 1197 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, v. Michael Sean EDMOND, Movant. No. CIV.A. 96-Z-2518. No. CRIM.A. 95-CR-72-Z. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 10, 1998. Michael Sean Edmond, pro se, Littleton, CO. Kathleen Tafoya, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Denver, CO, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER<

43 F.3d 472 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Ramon EDMOND, aka Looney; Calvin Springer, aka Cat, akaCardell Starr; Alondras Saunders, aka C-Nut, akaLon; and Joseph Dion Hill, aka J.D.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-10543. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1994.Decided Dec. 29, 1994.

Opinion by Judge LEAVY; Concurrence by Judge VAN SICKLE. LEAVY, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the district court’s order granting a new trial based on juror misconduct. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 8731, and we reverse. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS Alondras Saunders, Ramon Edmond, Calvin Springer, and Joseph Dion Hill were charged with several counts ste

WISS, Judge (concurring in the result): 20. The majority asserts: “A review of the record reveals that the 176-day delay in this ease was not due to ‘intentional dilatory conduct’ on the part of the Government.” 41 MJ at 422. It then notes that this record reveals that there was difficulty in contacting potential witnesses and co-accuseds who had “spread throughout the world” after the party; difficulty in

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-4133 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Dist

PER CURIAM. This matter is before the court on defendant’s application for a certificate of appeala-bility (COA). Defendant seeks to appeal from an order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For procedural reasons explained below, we grant COA, vacate the order denying the § 2255 motion, and remand the case with directions to appo

2 F.3d 404 U.S.v.Edmond* NO. 92-2437 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 18, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 97-3198 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge. I. Background On March 30, 1990, a jury returned guilty verdicts against a number of defendants in the above-captioned action. In addition, the jury returned special verdicts on Counts Six and Seven finding that the defendants’ interest in each of the pieces of real property identified in Counts Six and Seven is subject to for

EDWARDS, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by officer and enlisted members of being an accessory after the fact to an attempted sodomy committed by a shipmate, committing an indecent act with a different shipmate., and dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds in his checking account to honor each of three *789personal checks, in violation

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Edmond Clyde Sample appeals his conviction as a felon in possession of a firearm following a bench trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Mr. Sample challenges the denial of his motion to suppress weapons, the vitality of predicate felony convictions, and the sufficiency of the evidence of possession. We affirm the j

66 F.3d 313 U.S.v.Edmond Jones NO. 94-2123 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 02, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 94-cr-00115, Joyner, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

SNEED, Circuit Judge: Edmond Paul Khaton appeals the sentence imposed on him under the Sentencing Guidelines for bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. Khaton contends that the district court (1) erroneously concluded that it lacked discretion to depart downward, even though his “career offender” status significantly over-represented his criminal history,