Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Larry Ray Eames appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and to strike the illegal portion of his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Eames contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to reduce his sentence because United States Sentencing

MEMORANDUM ** Larry Ray Eames appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and to strike the illegal portion of his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Eames contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to reduce his sentence because United States Sentencing

MEMORANDUM ** Larry Ray Eames appeals pro se from the district court’s 2006 order denying his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) motion for the return of specific real and personal property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, dismiss in part, and remand in part. We affirm the district court’s rejection of Eames’ contentions alleging: 1) that

MEMORANDUM** Larry Ray Eames, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion for production of a sealed transcript of a pre-trial proceeding in his criminal ease. On July 24, 2003, the district court granted Eames’ motion to unseal the pre-trial hearing for transcrip*237tion purposes. Accordingly, this appeal is dis

MEMORANDUM** Larry Eames, federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for return of property. See Fed R. Crim. P. 41(e). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand the matter to the district court for resolution. As the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we do not recount it here except as is necessary to explain our d

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

538 U.S. 955 EAMES, AKA RODGERSv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-9216. Supreme Court of United States. March 31, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 859.

[Cite as State v. Eames, 2025-Ohio-2617.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. {48}L-24-1189 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202301009 v. Don Eames DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER JOHN L. PETERSON, Bankruptcy Judge. In this Chapter 7 case, Yellowstone Valley Properties, a co-partnership, and Safeco Insurance Company of America have filed a complaint against the Debtor, Kenneth L. Eames, seeking a determination that the debt owed each creditor is non-dischargea-ble under Section 523(a)(4) and (6) of the Bankruptcy Code. The parties have submitted the matter on an agreed statem

WHIPPLE, C.J. 12Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment denying their objection to the candidacy of Kenneth Cutno for the office of United States Representative, Second Congressional District. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Cutno qualified to run for the office of United States Representative, Second Congressional District, on July 21, 20

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

JOHNSON, Chief Justice, concurs and • assigns reasons. hi concur in the denial of the writ application for the following reasons. Qualifications for the office of United States Representative are contained in U.S. Const owe any outstanding fines. Art. 1, Section 2. These qualifications are exclusive, and neither a state constitution nor state law can add to nor take away from such qualifications. U.S. Term

793 F.Supp.2d 747 (2011) Larry EAMES, Petitioner, v. Tracy JONES, Warden, Respondent. No. 5:09-HC-2141-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. June 20, 2011. *748 Wes J. Camden, Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard, LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Petitioner. Seth Morgan Wood, U.S. Attorney'

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 417 S. State Street JOSEPH R. SLIGHTS III Dover, Delaware 19901 VICE CHANCELLOR Telephone: (302) 739-4397 Facsimile: (302) 739-6179 D

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 417 S. State Street JOSEPH R. SLIGHTS III Dover, Delaware 19901 VICE CHANCELLOR Telephone: (302) 739-4397 Facsimile: (302) 739-61

412 F.Supp.2d 431 (2006) Thomas A. EAMES, Roberta L. Eames, and Tammy Eames, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV.A.04-1324-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 2, 2006. *432 John S. Spadaro, Murphy Spadaro & Lando