⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Eap”

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
[J-43-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT BAER, C.J., TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : No. 5 EAP 2022 : Appellee : Petition for Certification of Question : of Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
[J-43-2022] [MO: Todd, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : No. 5 EAP 2022 : Appellee : Petition for Certification of Question : of Law from the United States Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-08-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 2961
[Cite as Gateway Royalty, L.L.C. v. EAP Ohio, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-2961.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY GATEWAY ROYALTY, LLC ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EAP OHIO, LLC, ET AL.,
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-09-11 · Published · cited 2× · 2024 Ohio 4522
[Cite as EAP Ohio, L.L.C. v. Sunnydale Farms, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-4522.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY EAP OHIO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUNNYDALE FARMS, LLC et al., Defen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
[J-69-2020] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. ANTHONY DEGLIOMINI AND KAREN : No. 5 EAP 2020 DEGLIOMINI, : : Appeal from the Order of Appellants : Commonwealth Court dated
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999-02-04 · Published · cited 3× · 40 F. Supp. 2d 1369; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5285; 1999 WL 184031
40 F.Supp.2d 1369 (1999) Khalilah McKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. EAP MANAGEMENT CORP., d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken, Jhonny Rojas and Jeanine Mediate, Defendants. No. 98-6062-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 4, 1999. *1370 *1371 *1372 Char
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1894L Filed: May 2, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ELIZABETH ORR, et al., * * * Plaintiffs, * * v.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-02-26 · Published · cited 2× · 916 F.3d 721
ERICKSON, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the Court's opinion but write separately to note an area of concern. During the two decades that have elapsed since we decided United States v. Kime , 99 F.3d 870 (8th Cir. 1996), significant developments have occurr
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-01-27 · Published · cited 4× · 230 F. Supp. 3d 475; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13070; 2017 WL 388825
MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge I. BACKGROUND On April 4, 2016, Michael Cousin filed this employment discrimination action against the United States of America, the United States Department of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Homeland Security,1 and other individual defendants in response to his removal from the federa
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017-11-03 · Published · cited 19× · 874 F.3d 778
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, defendant-appellant Juan Francisco Emilio Carbajal-Váldez advances two claims of error. First, he contends that the district court erred in imposing a sentencing enhancement based largely on his admission that he captained the cocaine-laden boat used in the smuggling attempt. Second, he contends that the government breached a plea agreement between the
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 93 F. Supp. 3d 1291; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21126; 2015 WL 763969
ORDER DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Defendant has filed a Motion to Suppress Kim Kimberling’s Counseling Records (Doc. No. 62), to which the United States has responded. The Court conducted a hearing on the issue on February 4, 2015, advising- the parties at the hearing that the issue would be taken under advisement. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and finds as follows.<
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-10-27 · Published · cited 1× · 59 F. Supp. 3d 1194; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160237; 2014 WL 6065638
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before Court on the Motion for Daubert Hearing and to Exclude Testimony Offered to Bolster Testimony from Another Witness, filed September 10, 2014 (Doc. 32)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on September 12, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the testimony of Gail Starr, Plaintiff United Stat
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 881 F. Supp. 2d 675; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107325; 2012 WL 3114728
MEMORANDUM OPINION TIMOTHY R. RICE, United States Magistrate Judge. As described by its own director of security, the Boeing Company’s Ridley Park facility was a mess five years ago. Some work areas were openly littered with drug paraphernalia. Special Agent Raymond Carr of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) described prescription drug abuse among Boeing workers as an “epidemic.” To make
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-03-18 · Published · cited 33× · 635 F.3d 956; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5361; 2011 WL 923502
635 F.3d 956 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James W. SNYDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3748. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 25, 2010. Decided March 18, 2011. *958 John F. Kness (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Pl
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2010-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 96 Fed. Cl. 131; 2010 WL 5097766
OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. Before the court in this post-award bid protest is defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff Joyce Terry, doing business as Shirt Shack, alleges that the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (“AAFES”) unlawfully awarded a concession contract at Fort Ben-ning in Columbus, Georgia to a concessionaire that purportedly did not satisfy certain requirements set forth in the solic
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 3× · 275 F. Supp. 3d 795
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is the Motion for Expedited Summary Judgment (Dkt. #•35) filed by the Plano Chamber of Commerce and more than fifty-five Texas and national business groups (collectively, “Business Plaintiffs”), After considering the relevant pleadings, the Court grants Business Plaintiffs’ motion. BA
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 6× · 218 F. Supp. 3d 520; 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 25; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162048; 2016 WL 6879615
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is the Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction *524(Dkt. # 10) filed by the State of Nevada and twenty other states (the “State Plaintiffs”). After considering the relevant pleadings, exhibits, and argument at the preliminary injunction hearing,
United States Court of International Trade · 2014-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 CIT 143; 32 F. Supp. 3d 1348; 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1389; 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143; 2014 WL 7139792
OPINION AND ORDER POGUE, Senior Judge: In this action, Plaintiff Shah Bros., Inc.. (“Shah Bros.”) — the prevailing party 1 — ■ *1350 was previously awarded, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice A
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 28× · 774 F.3d 359; 2014 FED App. 0295P; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23932; 2014 WL 7181321
OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Appellants in these consolidated cases contend that the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) negligently failed to follow its flood protocols in operating Old Hickory Dam, exacerbating the property damage caused by a one-thousand-year flood event in Tennessee. The district court dismissed Appellants’ claims for la
United States Court of International Trade · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 CIT 109; 9 F. Supp. 3d 1402; 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 940; 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 110; 2014 WL 4654474
OPINION AND ORDER POGUE, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Shah Bros., Inc. (“Shah Bros.”) — an importer of a smokeless tobacco product from India called “gutkha”— seeks an award of its attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs in connection with this action, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2012) (“EAJA”).