Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4424 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00375- AB-7 v. JUAN CARLOS ENRIQUEZ, OPINION

MEMORANDUM ** Noe Antonio Enriquez appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Enriquez contends that the district court erred at sentencing by: (1) presuming the Guidelines range

MEMORANDUM *** In these consolidated appeals, Jesus Antonio Enriquez-Montano appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 64-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and the consecutive 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto Enriquez-Valenzuela appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Valenzuela’s counsel has file

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Miguel Enriquez-Gallegos appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss supervised release proceedings, and the district court’s order denying him an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Gallegos’s counsel has filed

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enriquez-Corral appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Corral’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as cou

PER CURIAM: * Juan Alfredo Enriquez appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. Enriquez challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) and, additionally, the district court’s application of the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines. *603Enriquez’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is forecl

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Enriquez-Lino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Enriquez-Lino has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, cou

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Enriquez-Corral appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Corral’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as cou

MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Antonio Enriquez-Montano appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *617(1967), Enriquez-Montano’s counsel has f

MEMORANDUM ** Jonathan Enriquez-Perez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Perez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

MEMORANDUM ** Ancencion Enriquez-Degante appeals from his 41-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm. *553Enriquez-Degante contends that the district court erred by failing to co

PER CURIAM: * Filiberto Enriquez-Castillo (Enriquez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation subsequent to a felony conviction for a crime of violence. For the first time on. appeal, Enriquez argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or

PER CURIAM: * Epifanio Enriquez-Guevara (Enriquez) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following conviction for an aggravated felony and was sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Enriquez argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. This argument is foreclosed by

MEMORANDUM ** Ancencion Enriquez-Degante appeals from his 41-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm. *553Enriquez-Degante contends that the district court erred by failing to co

PER CURIAM.* Manuel Enriquez-Lino appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Enriquez-Lino contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense

35 F.Supp.2d 176 (1999) UNITED STATES v. William Soto ENRIQUEZ, et al. Criminal No. 97-76(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 11, 1999. Rafael Anglada-Lopez, San Juan, PR, pro se. Marlene Aponte-Cabrera, Hato Rey, PR, pro se. Rosa I. Bonini-Laracuente, San Juan, PR, pro se. Benny F. Cerezo, Rio Piedras, PR, pro se.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-2002 Filed: 7 January 2025 *************************************** MICHAEL ENRIQUEZ, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, *

51 F.3d 1043 U.S.v.Enriquez** NO. 94-10848 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 23, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:92-0279-R 1 DISMISSED.

42 F.3d 769 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Henry E. ENRIQUEZ; Richard Enriquez, also known as RichardEnriquez Arcos; Alonso Medina and ArlenePettigrew, Defendants,Gustavo F. Medina, also known as Angel Cortez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86, Docket 94-1013. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Sept. 21, 1994.Decided Dec. 19,