Cases

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-2002 Filed: 7 January 2025 *************************************** MICHAEL ENRIQUEZ, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, *

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4424 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00375- AB-7 v. JUAN CARLOS ENRIQUEZ, OPINION

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Florencio Diaz-Enriquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Diaz-Enriquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 466 Fed. Appx. 409.

MEMORANDUM ** Noe Antonio Enriquez appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Enriquez contends that the district court erred at sentencing by: (1) presuming the Guidelines range

MEMORANDUM *** In these consolidated appeals, Jesus Antonio Enriquez-Montano appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 64-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and the consecutive 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for *1179writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Guam denied.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto Enriquez-Valenzuela appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Valenzuela’s counsel has file

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1941Petition for rehearing denied.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Miguel Enriquez-Gallegos appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss supervised release proceedings, and the district court’s order denying him an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Enriquez-Gallegos’s counsel has filed

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.