Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Esparza-De La Rosa”
United States v. De La Rosapublic domain
Revised April 8, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-41346 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RENE DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant. A
United States v. Rene De La Rosapublic domain
POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal poses the question whether a trial court abused its discretion by refusing to admit evidence or advise the jury of a defendant’s prior acquittal on a related charge. Additionally, we are asked to determine whether sufficient evidence supported the conviction. We conclude that neither of the challenged rulings constitutes an abuse of discretion
Bolden v. United Statespublic domain
CAPITAL CASE MEMORANDUM CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court upon the revised amended motion of Robert Bolden, Sr., to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States has filed its opposition to the motion, and the issues are fully briefed. I. Background In the afternoon
United States v. Pizarropublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 12-1759 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL LUIS PIZARRO, a/k/a WEE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Gustavo A. Gelpí, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Rommypublic domain
506 F.3d 108 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Henk ROMMY, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 06-0520-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: November 28, 2006. Decided: November 5, 2007. *109 *110 Richard D. Willstatter, Green & Willstatter, W
De La Paz v. Statepublic domain
901 S.W.2d 571 (1995) Ricardo DE LA PAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 08-92-00444-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. April 13, 1995. Discretionary Review Refused September 13, 1995. *574 M. Clara Hernandez, El Paso County Defender, El Paso, for De La Paz, appellant. Jaime E. Esparza
129 F.3d 457 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Francisco PADILLA-PENA, aka Paco, Defendant--Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Ana Rosa PADILLA-PENA, aka Ana, Defendant--Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Roberto GUZZMAN, aka Beto, Defendant--Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Luis A. PADILLA-PENA, aka Ramone Pelone, Defend
United States v. Padilla-Penapublic domain
*461 JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Luis Padilla-Pena, Francisco Padilla-Pena, Ana Rosa Padilla-Pena, Angelica Padilla-Pena, Roberto Guzzman, Michael Padilla-Pena, and Artemio Esparza appeal their convictions of conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1997), varying counts of poss
271 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.TED STEVENSON ANGWIN and CHRISTINE KHAMIS, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 00-50276, 00-50411 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Sumbitted April 3, 2001Filed August 30, 2001Amended November 21, 2001 1</
Opinion by District Judge BREYER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERGUSON. OPINION BREYER, District Judge: The appellants Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine Khamis (“the defendants”) were stopped by United States Border Patrol (“USBP”) agents at a checkpoint near Niland, California. The agents inspected the motorhome the defendants were driving and found fourteen ill
Lopez v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRISTIAN LOPEZ, No. 23-870 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-882-422 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Charles Reedy v. the State of Texaspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00573-CR Charles Reedy, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-17-300977, THE HONORABLE BRAD URRUTIA, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury
University of Texas at El Paso v. Jamie Isaacpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO, § No. 08-16-00268-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
Lightsey Nathan Saul, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellant Lightsey Nathan Saul, Jr., appeals his conviction for soliciting the capi *675 tal murder of Joe Daggett, contending both that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of that crime, and that a purportedly tact
Texas Health & Human Services and El Paso State Supported Living Center v. David Sepulvedapublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS TEXAS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES § No. 08-22-00043-CV and EL PASO STATE SUPPORTED LIVING CENTER, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 129th Judicial District Court v.
People v. Vegapublic domain
Opinion STREETER, J. A jury returned verdicts convicting defendant Raul Vega Vega of, among other things, one count of first degree murder (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 187, 189) and one count of voluntary manslaughter (§ 192, subd. (a)), together with two special circumstances findings and various gang- and <
Delapaz v. Statepublic domain
228 S.W.3d 183 (2007) Mark Anthony DELAPAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-05-00660-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 28, 2007. Rehearing Overruled August 3, 2007. *185 F. Clinton Broden, Broden & Mickelsen, Dallas, for Appellant. William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr., Criminal Dis
Esparza Rico v. Florespublic domain
405 F.Supp.2d 746 (2005) Juvenal ESPARZA RICO and Acrelia Contreras Ortega, Individually and as the Sole Surviving Heirs of the Estate of their Son, Omar Esparza Contreras; Maria Ines Munoz Briones, Individually, as Next Friend of her Minor Children, Ingri Marvella Reyes Munoz and Clarisa Yajaira Reyes Munoz, and as a Surviving Heir of the Estate of her Husband, Juan Enrique Reyes Meza; Juan Antonio Reyes Aguilar, Individually; Irene Godinez Cardona, Ind
Howard Thomas Douglas v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00605-CR 5021070 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,