Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID Agency Nos. SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID A246-606-483 ANGEL SALVADOR-ROJAS; A246-606-482 KORINA SALVADOR-ROJAS, A246-606-484

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT SALVADOR- GOMEZ; DAVID

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID Agency

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT SALVADOR- GOMEZ; DAVID SALVADOR- Agency Nos. ROJAS; KORINA SALVADOR- A246-606-483 ROJAS, A246-606-482 A246-606-484 Petitioners, A246-606-485 v. ORDER PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, AMENDIN

FOR PUBLICATION FILED NOV 10 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

PER CURIAM. This matter comes before the court for review on various grounds, including that Defendant was subjected to ineffective assistance of counsel insofar as his trial counsel failed to fully inform him of the consequences of his guilty plea. Defendant’s counsel has sought permission to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), setting for

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3071 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adan Garcia-Garcia

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT DUE TO INVALID DEPORTATION Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Jose Luis Garcia-Morales’ (“Defendant”) October 16, 2015 motion to dismiss his indictment due to invalid deportation. Def. Mot., ECF No. 33. The motion has been fully briefed. Pl. Resp., ECF No. 34; Def. Reply, ECF No. 35. Upon consideration of the movin

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD. OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Christopher Osinger (Osinger) challenges his conviction for stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. Osinger asserts a facial challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 2261A as unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to his conduct.

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Shondolyn Rochelle Blevins was convicted by a jury for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, possession of a weapon in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Blevins appeals her conviction on all three counts. We AFFIRM. On a sentencing issue, we VACATE and REMAND for further proceedin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50338 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00758-ODW-1 CHRISTOPHER OSINGER, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright, District Judg

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Jon R. Hughes appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a “knock and talk” interview, an ensuing search, and further interrogation at a later date. His appeal presents nuanced questions concerning the nature of the interview, the voluntariness of his statements, the legitimacy of his consent to the search, and the workings of the inevitable discovery

623 F.3d 461 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cruz SAENZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3647. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 9, 2010. Decided October 13, 2010. *462 Bradley Blackington, Melanie C. Conour (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapol

Opinion by Judge RICHARD C. TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by JUDGE MILAN D. SMITH, JR. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Todd Johnson pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(1). On appeal Johnson argues (1) that the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress and (2) that the district c

REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  No. 08-30094 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00047-TMB TODD DOUGLAS JOHNSON, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States Distric