⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. FACEBOOK USER ID”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 136 F.4th 1129
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 5, 2024 Decided May 16, 2025 No. 23-5280 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. FACEBOOK, INC., APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:19-cv-0218
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2184 (TJK) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In July 2012, the Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Facebook, Inc.—now known as Meta Platforms, Inc.—resolved an administrative
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-01-29 · Published · cited 4× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 1122
VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The question presented by this motion is whether a lawsuit against Facebook, filed in Illinois state court by the Cook County State's Attorney, asserting violations of Illinois law and seeking civil penalties along with statewide injunctive relief, was properly removed to federal court. The answer is no. I. In 2018, the media reported that
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2184 (TJK) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action, the United States and Facebook request that the Court enter a stipulated order resolving allegations that Facebook violat
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2184 (TJK) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Almost eight years ago, the Federal Trade Commission and Facebook agreed to settle allegations that Facebook’s information-sharing and priv
California Court of Appeal · 2025-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/12/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR SIX4THREE, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, A166007, A167416 v. FACEBOOK, INC., et al., (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV533328) Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff Si
United States Tax Court · 2025-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Tax Court 164 T.C. No. 9 FACEBOOK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 21959-16. 1 Filed May 22, 2025. ————— O
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-04-01 · Published · cited 394× · 592 U.S. 395; 209 L. Ed. 2d 272; 141 S. Ct. 1163
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025-04-03 · Published · cited 1× · 335 A.3d 1; 2025 Pa. Super. 78
J-A22017-24 2025 PA Super 78 ARMSLIST LLC; TORQUELIST LLC; : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JONATHAN GIBBON; AND N. : PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW VARNEY, III : : Appellants : : : v. :
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 20-2725 & 2885 ____________ KAREN HEPP, Appellant in 20-2725 v. FACEBOOK; IMGUR INC; REDDIT INC; GIPHY INC, WGCZ S.R.O. Imgur Inc.; Reddit Inc., Appellants in 20-2885 ____________ On Appeal from the Unite
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CV-0550 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANT, V. FACEBOOK, INC.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-10-08 · Published · cited 13× · 160 N.E.3d 372; 2020 Ohio 4834
[Cite as Godwin v. Facebook, Inc., 2020-Ohio-4834.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA DEBBIE GODWIN, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109203 v. : FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., D
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: FACEBOOK, INC. No. 22-15077 SECURITIES LITIGATION, ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:18-cv- 01725-EJD AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ORDER AND MISSISSIPPI; JAMES KACOURIS, AMENDED individually and on behalf of all others
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-10-18 · Published · cited 28× · 87 F.4th 934
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: FACEBOOK, INC. No. 22-15077 SECURITIES LITIGATION, ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:18-cv- 01725-EJD AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OPINION MISSISSIPPI; JAMES KACOURIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Texas Supreme Court · 2021-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 20-0434 ══════════ IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC. D/B/A INSTAGRAM, RELATORS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ══════════════════════════════════════════ Argued February 24, 2021
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 311 F. Supp. 3d 1101
SALLIE KIM, United States Magistrate Judge Sam Rainsy ("Applicant") has filed an Ex Parte Application for leave to obtain third party discovery from Facebook for use in proceedings in Cambodia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") opposes the motion. Applicant seeks both documents fro
Cross v. Facebookpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2017-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/9/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JASON CROSS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A148623, A149140 v. FACEBOOK, INC., (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CI
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-03-08 · Published · cited 0× · 372 F. Supp. 3d 1005
Because Defendant's offense satisfies both parts of 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5), the offense involves a "federal crime of terrorism," and the terrorism enhancement applies. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.4(a) (2018). B. Enhancement's Treatment of Criminal History Nevertheless, as the Court held at sentencing, the enhancement's treatment of criminal history-automatically assigning to all terrorism defendants a crim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-03-03 · Published · cited 87× · 951 F.3d 1106
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW CAMPBELL; MICHAEL No. 17-16873 HURLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:13-cv-05996- PJH v. FACEBOOK, INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellee, v. ANNA W. ST. JOHN,
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018-06-15 · Published · cited 12× · 324 F. Supp. 3d 955
SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Currently pending before the court are motions by both parties. The first is the motion of Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Facebook") to dismiss ( Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 4 ) the complaint of Plaintiff Nicholas Georgalis ("Plaintiff" or "Georgalis") (Compl., ECF No. 1 ). Plaintiff opposed the motion and moved for final judgmen