Cases

COFFIN, Chief Judge. Hipólito Cruz, Felix Luna, and Wilberto Luna were charged in Count I of an indictment with conspiring to distribute heroin between March 8, 1976 and April 19, 1976. Count II of the indictment accused Cruz and Felix Luna of distributing heroin on March 8,1976. Wilberto Luna was charged in Count III with distributing

404 F.3d 497 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Felix MERCADO IRIZARRY; Manuel Vazquez-Mendez; Eliezer Morera-Vigo; Hernan Vazquez-Mendez; German Rodríguez Rodríguez, Defendants, Appellants. No. 02-1072. No. 02-1105. No. 02-1107. No. 02-1108. No. 02-1269. United States Court o

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Indictment in this case charges 36 defendants with conspiracy to commit racketeering, health care fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering in connection with an allegedly fraudulent no-fault insurance scheme. Presently before the Court are several pretrial motions filed by certain Defendants. Oral argument on these motions was held on April 1

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Nineteen individuals, including appellants Felix Mercado Irizarry, Hernán Vazquez-Mendez, Eliezer Morera-Vigo, Manuel Vazquez-Mendez, and German Rodríguez Rodriguez, were indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute in excess of one kilogram of heroin, five kilograms of cocaine, and fifty grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Defendan

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 7, 2021 Decided July 13, 2021 No. 19-3086 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. DERREK E. ARRINGTON, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:00-cr-00159-1)

Case: 20-1912 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/22/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC., ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY, ADMIRAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, MIDWEST EMPLOYERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Movant Hector Raymond Pena (“Pena”) filed this motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 (“Section 2255”) to vacate, set aside, or otherwise correct his conviction and - sentence, (“Motion,”-Dkt. No. 376.) Pena is currently serving a sentence of life imprisonment after a jury found him guilty of three counts of murder for hire in violation of 18 U

Case: 20-1912 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/22/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC., ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY, ADMIRAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, MIDWEST EMPLOYERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

PER CURIAM. A jury found Cruz Rodriguez guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(A). On appeal, Rodriguez challenges the district court’s1 decision to admit certain evidence under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. We affirm.

694 F.Supp. 1406 (1988) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ricardo MACIAS-PEDROZA, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Francisco Rafael HUGUES-ESPINOZA, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose Ernesto MORENO-GREEN and Oscar Lara Navarrete, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Roger A. CONTRERAS, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ric

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Richard L. EASTON, First Lieutenant U.S. Army, Appellant No. 12-0053 Crim. App. No. 20080640 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued March 12, 2012 Decided June 4, 2012 BAKER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STUCKY and

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Richard L. EASTON, First Lieutenant U.S. Army, Appellant No. 12-0053 Crim. App. No. 20080640 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued March 12, 2012 Decided June 4, 2012 BAKER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STUCKY and

801 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Salim Ahmed HAMDAN. CMCR 09-002. United States Court of Military Commission Review. June 24, 2011. *1253 Joseph M. McMillan argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Harry H. Schneider, Jr., Charles C. Sipos, Adam Thurschwell, and Captain Michael G. Thieme, U

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: Table of Contents Introduction.....................................................................70 Factual and Procedural Background................................................72 I. The Parties...........................................................72 II. General Factual Background.......................................

OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This case arises under the Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1505, and comes before the court for proceedings on remand from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after that court’s decision on an interlocutory appeal of questions certified by this court. See Wolfchild v. United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed.Cir.2009) (“Wolfchild VI”), cert. denied, - U.

*1125 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Unqualified Expert Testimony II, filed July 16, 2012 (Doc. 73) (“Motion in Limine”). The Court held hearings on July 25 and July 30, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether United Stat

MEMORANDUM ** Carlos Rodriguez appeals his conviction arising out of his participation in a robbery of an armored truck. The government argued at trial that Rodriguez, an employee of Brinks, International (“Brinks”), conspired with Felix Carrasco and Manuel Lopez to rob the Brinks truck that he was driving while it was parked outside of a Bank of America building. The jury found him guilty on all three count