Cases

JAY C. ZAINEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is "Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence" (Rec. 96). Defendant Derrick Felton moves to suppress all evidence obtained from the administrative subpoena issued by the FBI to Comcast Communications ("Comcast") on or about November 27, 2017 and evidence obtained without a warrant from the United States Postal Service ("USPS"). Felton argues that he had a reasonable expectat

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gerald Felton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Felton’s motion for reconsideration, we aff

CCA 20150510 DAILY JOURNAL Petitions for Grant of Review Denied

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gerald Felton appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Felton, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Mar.

PER CURIAM: Gerald Felton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2005) to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 505 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Our review discloses that a prior motion by Felton to reduce sentence based on Amendment 505 was unsuccessful. Moreover, Felton’s claim to reduce his sentence

PER CURIAM: James Felton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his “Motion for Permission to File a First § 2255 motion.” The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A p

239 F.Supp.2d 122 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Leo V. FELTON and Erica Chase, Defendants. No. CR. 01-10198-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 3, 2003. *123 Timothy G. Watkins, Federal Defender's Office, Lenore Glaser, Law Office of Lenore Glaser, Boston, for Erica Chase (1), Leo V. Felton (2), Defe

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. Appellant Felton Jones was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 860 and 21 U.S.C. § 846. The District Court determined that Jones’ prior convictions placed him in Criminal History Category II under the Gui

OPINION STAPLETON, Circuit Judge. Appellant, James E. Felton, Jr., pled guilty to having conspired to interfere with the Internal Revenue Service’s performance of its official duties. He did so pursuant to a plea agreement in which he voluntarily agreed to waive his right to appeal and/or collaterally attack his conviction. He was granted a two-level downward departure based on an extraordinary physical i

ORDER After Ella Rose Felton pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(2), the district court sentenced her to one month’s imprisonment and five years’ supervised release. After completing the imprisonment component of her sentence, Felton began serving her term of supervised release. In April 2000, however, Felton’s probation officer initiated revocation proceedings in the district court because Felto

71 F.3d 878 U.S.v.Felton* NO. 95-30124 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 16, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.La., No. CR-92-33-I 1 AFFIRMED.

755 F.Supp. 72 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Al FELTON, Defendant. No. S90 Cr. 808 (DNE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 17, 1991. *73 Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., Michael S. Sommer, David N. Kelley, Helen Gredd, Gerard E. Lynch, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel, New York City, for U.S.

OPINION OF THE COURT FOREMAN, Senior Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of assault with intent to commit sodomy, communicat*529ing a threat, and impersonating a Criminal Investigation Command agent, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military-Justice, 10

845 F.2d 1028 U.S.v.Felton NO. 87-1163 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. MAR 03, 1988 1 Appeal From: E.D.Mo. 2 AFFIRMED.

GIBBONS, Chief Judge, with whom SEITZ and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting in No. 85-3003, No. 85-3004 The law is no stranger to ironies, but it would take the talents of a Peter Finley Dunne, a Lewis Carroll, a Samuel Clemens or an Art Buchwald to explain that a statute called the Speedy Trial Act has as its chief, if not its sole, practical purpose the justification of post-indictment delays in

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1352 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD R. FELTON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

811 F.2d 190 The UNITED STATESv.Dean K. FELTON, Nancy E. Bruce, John Zorak a/k/a Johnny,Anthony Serrao, a/k/a Buddy, Richard Cox a/k/aRicky, James Thurman, John Hathorn.Dean K. FELTON, Appeal ofNancy E. BRUCE, Appeal of Nos. 85-3303, 85-3304. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Originally Argued Jan. 16, 1986.Resubmitted to the Origi

753 F.2d 256 The UNITED STATESv.Dean K. FELTON, Nancy E. Bruce, John Zorak a/k/a Johnny,Anthony Serrao a/k/a Buddy, Richard Cox a/k/aRicky, James Thurman, John Hathorne.Appeal of UNITED STATES of America. No. 84-3398. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 7, 1984.Decided Jan. 8, 1985.As Amended Jan. 15, 1985.

OPINION DIAMOND, District Judge. Various pretrial motions filed by the defendants in the above-captioned matter *600were denied by this court by order dated April 1, 1985. The following constitutes the reasons for their denial. Speedy Trial Act Defendant Felton has filed a renewed motion to dismiss C

753 F.2d 276 The UNITED STATESv.Dean K. FELTON, Nancy E. Bruce, John Zorak a/k/a Johnny,Anthony Serrao a/k/a Buddy, Richard Cox a/k/aRicky, James Thurman, John Hathorne.Appeal of John HATHORN. No. 84-3270. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 17, 1984.Decided Jan. 16, 1985.