Cases

120 F.3d 274 U.S.v.Field* NO. 96-3639 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 16, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. ,No.9600289CRT23A 1 Affirmed.

867 F.Supp. 869 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Clark Beach FIELD, Richard Field, aka Mike Field, Rudell Oppegard and Martin O. Gjerde, Defendants. Crim. Nos. 4-94-41(1), 4-94-41(2). United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. November 17, 1994. *870 Daniel Martin Scott, U.S. Public Defenders Offic

JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Richard Field and Clark Beach Field take this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s1 denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment against them on the. ground of double jeopardy. The government also appeals from the district court’s order vacating an ex parte restraining order the government had obtained over the Fields’ property. The restraining or

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-2212 UNITED STATES,

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. There are two issues raised in this appeal: whether the district court erred in accepting defendant’s guilty plea; and whether the district court erred in sentencing defendant. Defendant-appellant was charged in count two of a two-count indictment with being a felon in possession of a firearm on February 28, 1993, in violati

855 F.Supp. 1518 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael C. FIELD, Defendant. No. 94-CR-13-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin June 9, 1994. Robert Anderson, U.S. Atty., for U.S. Peter Wold, Wold, Jacobs & Johnson, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant. ORDER CRABB, Chief Judge. In a report and recommenda

OPINION OF THE COURT JAMES, Judge: This case is about the provision of Manual for Courts-Martial (hereinafter MCM), Part IV, paragraph 46e(l) (1984) that doubles the maximum confinement which may be adjudged for larceny when the stolen property is “military property.” Sergeant Field was convicted on his pleas of guilty of larceny of “military property,” namely $39,739.26 from a fund used to pay for “comme

937 F.2d 619 U.S.v.Field* NO. 90-8748 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUN 25, 1991 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

301 B.R. 830 (2003) In re ABATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC., Debtor. United States of America, Appellant, v. Scott D. Field, Trustee, Appellee. Civ. No. AMD 02-4033. United States District Court, D. Maryland. May 27, 2003. *831 MEMORANDUM DAVIS, District Judge. This is an appeal by the United St

938 F.2d 189 U.S.v.Field (Clark B.) NO. 90-5490 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. APR 04, 1991 1 Appeal From: D.Minn. 2 AFFIRMED.

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the issue of whether the district court had ancillary jurisdiction over Stacey Field’s motion to expunge the record of her arrest. In 2000, Field was indicted on charges of receipt of stolen property and aiding and abetting a bank robbery after the fact. After the district court granted Fie

578 F.2d 1371 U. S.v.Field No. 77-1500 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 4/24/78 S.D.N.Y., 432 F.Supp. 55 AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHANG WOOK ROH, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Civil Case No. 21-1291 (RJL) U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, e¢ al., Nee Nome Nene ree Nee ree “ee “mee ee” ee” Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER (November / A 5001) [Dkt. # 3] Plaintiffs Chang Wook Roh, Hoji Chang, and Hyounjun Chang brought the present suit seeking to compel the Government to adjudicate the plaintiffs’ pending immigration- related applications. See Compl. ff 1, 7-1

432 F.Supp. 55 (1977) UNITED STATES of America v. Fred R. FIELD, Jr., Defendant. No. 76 Cr. 1117. United States District Court, S. D. New York. April 22, 1977. *56 *57 Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, for the United States of America; Joh

535 F.2d 660 U. S.v.Field No. 76-1739 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 6/28/76 S.D.Fla., 532 F.2d 404

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

307 F.Supp.2d 498 (2003) David A. FIELD and Ellen J. Field, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 01 CIV.3000(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 18, 2003. *499 Elliot I. Miller, Esq., Kleban & Samor, P.C., Southport, CT, for Plaintiffs. Edward Chang, Assistant United States At

MEMORANDUM OPINION MARK B. McFEELEY, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on the complaint of the United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) seeking to modify the automatic stay to allow plaintiff to make a tax assessment and file a notice of federal tax lien. The debtor failed to file an answer to the Internal Revenue Service’s complaint, and did not appear on the hearing. Followin

PER CURIAM: Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

OPINION AND ORDER GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Blue Field (Sichuan) Food Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Blue Field”) contests a final determination of the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in the twelfth periodic administrative review of an antidumping duty order on preserved mushrooms from the People’s Republic of China. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF N