Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr- 00387-AB-1 v. STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed December 1, 2017 (Doc. 78)("Motion"); (ii) the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Suppress All Evidence Seized and Any Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Obtained as a Result of the Unlawful Search, filed July 24, 2018 (Doc. 141)("Supp. Motion"); (iii) the Defendant Bentley Streett'

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Motion to Void Search Warrant For DNA Sample or For Return of DNA Sample Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(g), filed July 6, 2017 (Doc. 29)("Motion"); and (ii) Defendant Sedillo's Opposed Motion to Join in Defendant Sabaquie's Motion to Void Search Warrant for DNA Sample or For Return of DNA Sample Pursuant to F.R.C.P.

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 3 DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge On August 2, 2017, the court held a hearing on the motions of defendant Pur-vis Lamar Ellis to suppress evidence, obtained from use.of Stingrays on behalf of all defendants; to suppress evidence seized from Apartment 212 on behalf of all defendants; and to sever. The court DE

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10246 Plaintiff-Appellant,

Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of failure to go to his appointed place *130 of duty, disobedience of a superior commissioned officer, two specifications of

MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge This case came on for trial by the Court on February 17, 2016. The sole issue in this bench trial was whether the government has sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, Andrew Justin Johnson (“Johnson” or “defendant”), knowingly and intentionally conspired with Preston Holmes, III (“Holmes”), Matthew Jones

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Henry L. Williams III, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 15-0140 Crim. App. No. 20130284

ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Movant Richard Larry Self filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. CVDoc. I.1 United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf issued a report and recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the motion be denied. CVDoc. 29 at 815. Movant filed an objection to the R & R on

(text box: 1) NO. 5-03-0774 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ________________________________________________________________________ DONNA M. KINKEL, Individually and on ) Appeal from the Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, ) Circuit

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Chadrick L. CAPEL, Senior Airmen U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 12-0320 Crim. App. No. S31819 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued October 10, 2012 February 14, 2013 BAKER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ERDMANN and RYAN,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DlSTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Case No. 17-2511 (RJL) AT&T INC., et al., § Defendants. § F I L E D h/_ JUN 1 2 2018 MEMORAND_UM OPINION @9.'3§‘§ ?t?ili‘%‘l鑧l§§?'é’§ll¥l§¥a (June LZ, 2018) If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small

ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. The government indicted Defendant Daniel Rigmaiden on July 23, 2008, charging him with 50 counts of mail and wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy. Doc. 3. A Superseding Indictment was filed on January 27, 2010. Doc. 200. The charges arise from an alleged scheme to obtain fraudulent tax refunds by filing electronic tax returns in the names of numer

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. The United States seeks summary judgment against Glenn A. Baxter, a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) amateur radio licensee, for forfeitures based on three asserted violations of the Communications Act of 1934(Act) and its regulations: 1) failure to respond to an FCC inquiry in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 308; 2) willful or malicio

638 F.3d 281 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Jude BLAUVELT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4601. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 10, 2010. Decided: March 9, 2011. *283 ARGUED: Jason E. Silverstein, Roland Walker & Mark Zayon, PA, Baltimore, Mar

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small wonder it had to go to trial! *164On November 20, 2017, t

599 F.Supp.2d 592 (2009) UNITED STATES, v. Gene G. PARSON, Defendant. Criminal No. 3:2007-10. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 25, 2009. *594 Marketa Sims, Federal Public Defender's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendant. Stephanie L. Haines, United States Attorney's Office, Johnstown, PA, for Unite

583 F.Supp.2d 694 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Jamie RICHARDSON, Defendant. Criminal No. 3:2006-31. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. October 31, 2008. *696 Adam B. Cogan, Esquire, for Defendant. John J. Valkovci, Jr., AUSA, for U.S. MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER OF COURT KIM R.

657 F.Supp.2d 1186 (2009) 911 MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Case No. 08-47-HU. United States District Court, D. Oregon. September 10, 2009. *1187 Marc K. Sellers, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Portland, OR, for Plaintiff. Kent Robi

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Over the past several years, Plaintiffs Competitive Enterprise Institute, Energy & Environmental Legal Institute, and Free Market Environmental Law Clinic have filed numerous Freedom of Information Act requests with the Environmental Protection Agency, seeking to obtain informa