Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Flores-Rico”
Rico v. Florespublic domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: For this 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) interlocutory appeal from a remand-denial because of improper joinder, I concur in part TV.A of the majority opinion (holding the absence of consent by in-state defendants Flores and Trevino did not render Union Pacific’s removal invalid). In parts IV.B and
Flores-Flores v. Horizon Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are plaintiffs motion to remand to state court (Docket # 7), and defendant’s opposition thereto (Docket # 11). After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. Factual and Procedural Background This is an action to recover damages stemming from defendant
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico Apelación Apelada 2024 TSPR 96 v. 214 DPR ___ Rosa Cortés Flores y otros Apelantes Número del Caso: AC-2023-0087 Fecha: 4 de septiembre de 2024 Tribunal de Apelaciones:
Flores-Rivera v. United Statespublic domain
JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is petitioner Sandra Flores-Rivera's (henceforth "Petitioner" or "Sandra Flores") motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket No. 1) and the United States' (or the "government") opposition thereto (Docket No.
Esparza Rico v. Florespublic domain
405 F.Supp.2d 746 (2005) Juvenal ESPARZA RICO and Acrelia Contreras Ortega, Individually and as the Sole Surviving Heirs of the Estate of their Son, Omar Esparza Contreras; Maria Ines Munoz Briones, Individually, as Next Friend of her Minor Children, Ingri Marvella Reyes Munoz and Clarisa Yajaira Reyes Munoz, and as a Surviving Heir of the Estate of her Husband, Juan Enrique Reyes Meza; Juan Antonio Reyes Aguilar, Individually; Irene Godinez Cardona, Ind
United States v. De Castro Fontpublic domain
593 F.Supp.2d 393 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge DE CASTRO FONT [1], Defendant. Criminal No. 08-337 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 15, 2009. *394 Lydia Lizarribar-Buxo, Lizarribar Masini Law Office, Joseph A. Eloucher-Martinez, San Juan, PR, for Dependant. Juan A. Marques
United States v. De Castro-Fontpublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge A. DE CASTRO-FONT, Defendant. Civil No. 08-337 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. I. Introduction On December 3, 2008, the United States submitted a motion notifying the Court that defendant J
Caraballo v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant Sergio Crespo Caraballo seeks relief from the forfeiture of approximately $80,000 by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and requests cancellation of a related tax deficiency imposed by the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. The district court concluded that appellant’s claims are not justiciable in federal court, and we agree, substantially for the reasons articulated by the district ju
Nery v. United Statespublic domain
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action
Rivera-Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.public domain
840 F.Supp. 3 (1993) Iris Velia RIVERA-FLORES, Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE CO., Defendant. Civ. No. 89-1697 (HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 1, 1993. *4 Harry Anduze-Montano, Guillermo J. Ramos-Luina, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiff. Edgardo Colon-Arraras, Migdalia Davila-Garcia, Goldman, An
Perla-Benitez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F. 3d 164 (third judgment) and 165 (first, second, and fourth judgments).
United States v. Peckpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-4000 Document: 126-1 Date Filed: 06/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 10, 2025
United States v. Torrespublic domain
22-2527-cr (L) United States v. Torres In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________ August Term 2023 Nos. 22-2527-cr (L), 22-2652-cr (CON), 22-2976 (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
United States v. Turnerpublic domain
Case: 23-50461 Document: 105-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50461 ____________
United States v. Cortezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1029 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. DAMIAN CORTEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Carrascopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1396 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO CARRASCO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge] Befor
Rivera Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.public domain
776 F.Supp. 61 (1991) Iris Velia RIVERA FLORES, Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 89-1697 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 5, 1991. *62 Guillermo J. Ramos-Luina, Hato Rey, P.R., for plaintiff. Rogelio Capestany-Morales, San Juan, P.R., for defendant.
United States v. Commonwealth of PRpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In 1952, Congress enacted the McCar-ran Amendment, 43 U.S.C. § 666, a law that waived the sovereign immunity of the United States in suits for the general adjudication or administration of water rights. This appeal turns on the scope of that waiver. The underlying litigation flows from Puerto Rico’s efforts to impose restrictions on
United States v. Rodriguez-Bermudezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1259 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NASHALIE SAMARY RODRÍGUEZ-BERMÚDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Colottipublic domain
21-932 (L) U.S. v. Colotti In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 No. 21-932(L), 21-937(CON), 21-950(CON), 21-992(CON), 21-1548(CON) - NARDINO COLOTTI, ALEX RUDAJ, PRENKA IVEZAJ, NIKOLA DEDAJ, ANGELO DIPIETRO, Pet