Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Flores-Rodriguez”
United States v. Flores-Rodriguezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Israel Flores-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Flores-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity
United States v. Flores-Rodriguezpublic domain
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part. Flores-Rodriguez suffered no prejudice from the defects in his underlying deportation proceeding. Even had the immigration judge informed Flores-Rodriguez of his eligibility for a § 212(h) waiver, the outcome of the proceedings would not have changed because Flores-Rodriguez did not have a visa immediately available to him. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) (providing
United States v. Rodriguez-Florespublic domain
Case: 21-40277 Document: 00516199497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-40277 February 11, 2022
Flores-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Rodriguez-Florespublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. *1312 Defendants Jose Remberto Guzman-Dominguez and Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Flores were arrested at a state port of entry after an inspector found cocaine and heroin in their truck (a tractor-trailer). The truck contained a large quantity of legitimate cargo (chemic
Rodriguez-Flores v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Rodriguez-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The federal public defender appointed to represent Juan Pablo Rodriguez-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez-Flores has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accord
Flores-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Flores-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Abraham Rodriguez Florespublic domain
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Following his conviction for knowingly and intentionally distributing heroin, Abraham Flores appeals only the sentence he received. First, he claims that the United States Sentencing Guidelines should not have been used to determine his sentence because they are unconstitutional. In the alternative, he claims that the Guidelines were imposed inc
BAUER, Chief Judge. Feilberto Flores, Angel L. Fontanez, and Amador Rodriguez (“defendants”) are three forcibly retired entrepreneurs. Like many successful entrepreneurs, they ran a well-organized commercial enterprise and made a substantial profit. 2 There was however, a difference in their business from the American n
United States v. Oscar Flores-Sandoval, Also Known as Armando Polanco-Diaz, Also Known As, Daniel Sanchez-Rodriguezpublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Oscar Joel Flores-Sandoval was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). That indictment was dismissed, after this court’s opinion in United States v. Flores-Sandoval, 422 F.3d 711 (8th Cir.2005). Flores-Sandoval was re-indicted one week later. The district court
United States v. Oscar Flores-Sandoval, Also Known as Armando Polanco-Diaz, Also Known as Daniel Sanchez-Rodriguezpublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) 1 may take custody of a person and fingerprint him without any admissible reason to believe the person is an illegal alien. We conclude that such a custodial detention without justification offends the Fourth Amendm
903 F.2d 826 U.S.v.Rodriguez Flores (Rogelio), Salinas (Marciano, Jr.) NO. 89-1585 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. MAY 07, 1990 W.D.Tex., 901 F.2d 1111 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
United States v. Sergio Moreno-Flores, United States of America v. Sergio Alberto Rodriguez-Molinapublic domain
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent in the Moreno-Flores case and concur in the Rodriguez-Molina case. Once a defendant invokes his right to remain silent, it must be scrupulously honored. Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 104, 96 S.Ct. 321, 326-27, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975). All interrogation must cease. Interrogation is express q
Elenilson Flores Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 13-14-00594-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/16/2015 10:12:32 PM
RODRIGUEZ-FLORES v. Statepublic domain
351 S.W.3d 612 (2011) Esau Alejandro RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 03-09-00433-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. October 28, 2011. *616 Lisa Stewart, Assistant District Attorney, Austin, TX, for appellee. Leonard Martinez, Austin, TX, for appellant. Before Chief Justice JONES
Bello v. United Statespublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Co
Pedro Flores Rodriguez v. Yolanda Salgado Yanez, epublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Appellant Pedro Antonio Flores Rodriguez petitioned for the return of his child, A.S.F.S., under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the -International Child Abduction Remedies Act. The district court denied Flores’s petition. Flores now appeals, and we REVERSE in part, VACATE in part, and REMAND f
Esau Alejandro Rodriguez-Flores v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00433-CR Esau Alejandro Rodriguez-Flores, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-08-200834, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING