Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1386 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. MICHAEL FRANCIS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge] Before

22-1080-cr United States v. Francis In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2022 SUBMITTED: MAY 12, 2023 DECIDED: AUGUST 8, 2023 No. 22-1080-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1514 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Francis James Kistler

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-1033 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. FRANCIS RAIA _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of N

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201800178 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. RYAN F. FRANCIS Hospitalman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. A jury found Kenneth Allen Francis guilty on three federal firearms charges-namely, two counts of making false statements to a firearms dealer, see 18 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(6) and one count of unlawful disposition of a fire

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-1033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. FRANCIS RAIA (D.N.J. No. 2-18-cr-00657-001) Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, AMBRO and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges 1. Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-1033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANCIS RAIA, Appellant (D.N.J. No. 2-18-cr-00657-001) Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, AMBRO and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges 1. Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL GCO-002-E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-1033 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. FRANCIS RAIA __________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Distr

PRECEDENTIAL GCO-002-E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-1033 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. FRANCIS RAIA __________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Di

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1904 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Francis Stanford Stricker,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35483 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:22-cv-00147- v. BLW 4:18-cr-00175- FRANCIS R. CASILDO, BLW-2 Defendant

SUMMARY ORDER In this portion of a tandem appeal, Kenneth Francis appeals from an amended judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Holwell, J.) on September 6, 2011. For the following reasons, we affirm. On December 15, 2008, Francis plead guilty to one count of access device fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(5) and one count of consp

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: This Court is asked to determine whether the entry of a final restitution order or an amended judgment that imposes a more onerous restitution award under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5) constitutes a “critical stage” of trial. proceedings requiring access to counsel. Defendant-Appellant Francis Yu-vini Guerra Pleitez (“Pleitez”) en

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patrick Earl Francis seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(B) (2006

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patrick Earl Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United S

OPINION OF THE COURT (February 19, 2014) McKEE, Chief Judge In this consolidated appeal, Francis Brooks, Enid Edwards, and Bill John-Baptiste challenge their convictions following trial before the District Court. All convictions stemmed from the defendants’ alleged extortion, kidnapping, bribes, and drug trafficking wh

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Francis Alan Schmitz pleaded guilty to a charge of mail fraud and was ordered to serve 84 months in prison, a term slightly below the low end of the sentencing range advised by the Sentencing Guidelines. Schmitz contends that the district court committed two errors in sentencing him: (1) a procedural error, when it failed to address his c

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Troné Lamon Donell Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Francis Leroy McLain was convicted for failing to account for and pay employment taxes in violation of 26 U.S.C § 7202. He initially was sentenced to 48 months’ imprisonment and fined $75,000. In a first appeal, we affirmed his conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded for re-sentencing on the existing record. United States v. McLain, </