Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1880 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DARREN FRANKLIN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal No. 07-cr-178 (JDB) JEFFREY FRANKLIN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant Jeffrey Franklin is currently detained at FCI Beckley in Beaver, West Virginia, where he is serving a sentence of 126 months’ incarceration for violating t

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.

STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 70) on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Custodial Statements (Doc. # 55). This Court adopts in part and rejects in part Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 70). Defendant's Motion to Suppress Custodial Statements (Doc. # 55) is granted in part and denied in part. For the reasons stated below, the Co

Per Curiam. The defendant-appellants' petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED, and the opinion and judgment issued February 26, 2018, are VACATED. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 52 and Wis. Stat. § 821.01, we request that the Wisconsin Supreme Court answer a question of Wisconsin law that should control our decision

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10425 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr-08207- v. DGC-1 FRANKLIN PAUL ELLER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G.

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600388 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. WILLIAM E. FRANKLIN Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

-UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Be fore K.J. BRUBAKER, M .C. HOLIFIELD, A.C. RUGH Appe llate M ilitary Judge s UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA v. JOSEPH R. FRANKLIN SERGEANT (E-5), U.S. M ARINE CORPS N

Pillard, Circuit Judge: J.A., a teenage boy, testified at trial that Defendant-Appellant Franklin Torres, an adult twice his age, had anal sex with him, and that during the same encounter Torres used his cell phone to take four photographs of J.A.'s erect penis while J.A. was lying on his back alone on his parents' bed, naked, with his hands covering his face. Torres posted one of the

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves child pornography. The defendant, Mr. Richard Franklin, subscribed to a website called “GigaTribe.” Like some other popular websites, GigaTribe allowed Mr. Franklin to approve other subscribers as “friends,” allowing them into his “tribe.” For his so-called “tribe,” Mr. Franklin posted previews of pornographic images of children. In

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Franklin Brown seeks to reduce his 292-month drug-distribution sentence based on the retroactive application of Amendment 782 to the federal sentencing guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The district court denied the motion, determining that Brown’s .offense level was unaffected by the amendment. We affirm. Between 2003 and 2008, Brown purchased and distributed millions of

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. *360 In federal criminal law, the amount of restitution for a fraud conviction depends on the victims' actual losses, regardless of whether the defendant intended larger losses. When imposing restitution, the district court must say enough about its loss calculation,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1969 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FRANKLIN V. FENNELL, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Per Curiam Upon consideration of appellant's petition for panel rehearing filed on August 16, 2018, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that the petition be denied. 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (a) is

OPINION GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. Appellants Franklin Thompson and Lamar Gibson appeal the District Court’s denial of their 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motions for sentence reduction. 1 Section 3582(c)(2) permits a district court to exercise its discretion to reduce a sentence only if: (1) the sen

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Lagene Franklin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (20

663 F.3d 1289 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Jonathan L. FRANKLIN, Appellant. No. 10-3001. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 23, 2011. Decided December 20, 2011. Michael E. Lawlor, appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Sicilia C. Englert, appointe

ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL, United States Magistrate Judge. THIS CAUSE came on to be heard and was heard before the undersigned at the close of a Rule 11 proceeding that was held before this court on December 21, 2011. At that time, the court presented the issue of whether or not defendant should be detained, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). This matter further came before the court pursuant to an oral mot

630 F.3d 53 (2011) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Darren FRANKLIN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-1529. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 9, 2010. Decided January 5, 2011. *54 Jonathan Shapiro, with whom Alexandra Deal was on brief, for appellant. Scott A.C. Meisler, Criminal Divisi

KANNE, Circuit Judge. For five years, Franklin Brown led a lucrative life in Chicago’s cocaine trade. Eventually, however, fate caught up with him. Federal authorities arrested Brown and charged him with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. The jury convicted, and the district court sentenced Brown to nearly twenty-five years in prison. Now, Brown challenges that result. He claim