Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Garcia-Vazquez”
United States v. Vazquez-Garciapublic domain
Appellate Case: 24-2074 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 12, 2025
Vazquez-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Vazquez-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Eloy Vazquez-Garciapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-1596 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * * Eloy Vazquez-Garcia, *
United States v. Eloy Vazquez-Garcia, United States of America v. Juan Carlos Sosa-Alvaradopublic domain
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Eloy Vazquez-Gareia and Juan Carlos Sosa-Alvarado appeal their convictions for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and attempt to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000) and § 846. Both defendants originally pleaded guilty to the conspiracy count, but
Vazquez-Garcia v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MIGUEL VAZQUEZ-GARCIA, § § No. 149, 2019 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1803019333 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, §
United States v. Jose Garcia Vazquezpublic domain
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Jose Garcia Vazquez, checked in at Honolulu International Airport for a flight to Manila, Philippines on February 6, 1983. He checked two pieces of luggage. A customs agent searched the bags and found that one contained an Uzi 9 millimeter carbine rifle and 10 boxes of 9 millimeter ammunition. The appellant had no license to export weapon
Garcia Arroyo, Natalio v. Vazquez Saldaña, Hipolitopublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Natalio García Arroyo Apelación procedente del Tribunal de Apelado Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de v.
Bello v. United Statespublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Co
United States v. Betancourtpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Daniel Fernandez and Jose Betancourt appeal from convictions for conspiring to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), 846. Fernandez, who stands convicted after a jury trial, argues on appeal that (1) the district court erred in denying him a mistrial, (2) the district court’s multiple conspiracy jury charge was erroneous, (3) there was a prejudicia
King v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Gonzalez-Silva v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Renteria-Vazquez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Robles-Vazquez v. Tirado Garciapublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from an order of the district court vacating an earlier $2.25 million judgment following a jury verdict in plaintiffs-appellants’ favor on their individual claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Puer-to Rico Constitution. At issue is the power of the district court to grant judgment as a matter of law after a jur
Robles-Vazquez v. Tirado Garciapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1375 ELBA ROBLES-VAZQUEZ, ET AL, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v.
United States v. Vazquezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Cleofas Contreras Vazquez and Jose Ernesto Garcia appeal their convictions, after a jury trial, for conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms and more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Turning first to the issues raised in Vazquez’s appeal, we conclude that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. “[A
United States v. Ramos-Gonzalezpublic domain
747 F.Supp.2d 280 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Roberto RAMOS-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-318 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 8, 2010. *283 Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo Law Office, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, Robert Millan, Millan Law
Vazquez-Garcia v. Trans Union De Puerto Ricopublic domain
222 F.Supp.2d 150 (2002) Jose VAZQUEZ-GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION DE PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. CIVIL NO. 00-2071 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 18, 2002. Peter J. Porrata, Maritere Perez-Pascual, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Eric J. Berlingeri-Vincenti, De Corral & De Mier, Fernando J. Gierbolini-Gonzalez, Salv
United States v. Rosario-Camachopublic domain
697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue
United States v. Vasques-Garciapublic domain
PER CURIAM: Victor Vasques-Garcia pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) (2006), and was sentenced to fifty-seven months of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm. Vasques-Garcia argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance for failing to move for a sentence below the advisory guidelines