Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Garza Pulido”
United States v. Rosas-Pulidopublic domain
526 F.3d 829 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Adahir ROSAS-PULIDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-41223. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 1, 2008. *830 Paula Camille Offenhauser, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Tony Ray Roberts (argued), Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Mey
United States v. Basulto-Pulidopublic domain
MEMORANDUM * José Isaac Basulto-Pulido appeals his conviction and sentence for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an 8 U.S.C. § 1326 indictment when the motion alleges due process defects in the underlying deportation proceeding. See United States v. Muro-Inclan, 249 F.3d 1180, 1182 (9th Cir.20
United States v. Arce-Gonzalezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Hipólito Arce-Gonzalez (Arce) appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to being illegally present in this country following removal. Arce argues that the district court erred by finding that his prior Texas felony conviction for burglary of a habitation was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). In United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F
United States v. Collinspublic domain
604 F.3d 481 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2360. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 1, 2010. Decided May 10, 2010. *483 Kartik Kalyan Raman (argued), Office of the United States, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
United States v. Figueroa-Cruzpublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Defendant Edilberto Figueroa-Cruz appeals his conviction of possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The cocaine was found hidden in a speaker box in the trunk of a car that
United States v. Diaz-Coradopublic domain
648 F.3d 290 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier DIAZ-CORADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-40179. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 2, 2011. *291 Jeffrey Alan Babcock, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def.,
United States v. Percelpublic domain
553 F.3d 903 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sugentino PERCEL; Eric Vasquez, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-20236. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 23, 2008. *906 John Richard Berry, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Henry E. Marines, Law Offices of Hen
United States v. Diaz-Coradopublic domain
REVISED AUGUST 24, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 2, 2011 No. 10-40179 Lyle W. Cayce
Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. v. Pulidopublic domain
674 S.W.2d 382 (1984) HYDRO-LINE MANUFACTURING CO., Appellant, v. Manuel Alcocer PULIDO, Appellee. No. 13-83-388-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. May 24, 1984. Rehearing Denied June 21, 1984. *383 B.R. Dossett, Harlingen, for appellant. Richard Arroyo, Brownsville, for appellee. Before
United States v. Brown, Timothypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2214 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIMOTHY BROWN, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illin
United States v. Timothy Brown, Jr.public domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Timothy Brown, Jr. was convicted of possessing cocaine base and cocaine hydrochloride with the intent to distribute, within one thousand feet of public housing. On appeal, Brown challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was not sufficient evidence to convict him of pos
Milk Indust. Regulatory Office v. Ruiz Ruizpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-9009 IN RE: LUIS MANUEL RUIZ RUIZ, d/b/a Lowy Farm, Debtor, MILK INDUSTRY REGULATORY OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, a/k/a ORIL, Appellant, v. LUIS MANUEL RUIZ RUIZ, d/b/a Lowy Farm, Appellee. APP
Briones v. Statepublic domain
76 S.W.3d 591 (2002) Jorge Fernando BRIONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 13-00-496-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 21, 2002. *592 Reynaldo G. Garza Jr., Brownsville, for Appellant. John A. Olson, Asst. County & Dist. Atty., Yolanda De Leon, Dist. Atty., Brownsville, for Appellee
Raul Lopez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-22-00230-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG RAUL LOPEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, T
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
$281,420.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
Dissenting Memorandum Opinion by Justice VELA. I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision to award the $281,420 to Gregorio Huerta. First, I would hold the trial court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict because a directed verdict would have been proper as Huerta totally failed to establish his right to the property under any theory of law. Second, I would hold the State established as
$281,420.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-06-00158-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
$281,420.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-06-00158-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG $281,420.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas
State v. Arceo-Rojaspublic domain
No. 119,266 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ERIKA YAZMIN ARCEO-ROJAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts use a bifurcated standard of review when considering
Juan Herrera v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00084-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JUAN HERRERA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 148th District Court of