Cases

WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. Defendant Leandro Gomes ("Gomes") was indicted for one count of conspiracy to sex traffic a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c) ; one count of sex trafficking a child, in violation of

642 F.3d 43 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Patrick GOMES, a/k/a Pistol, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-1527. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 9, 2011. Decided April 13, 2011. George F. Gormley, by appointment of the court, with whom Stephen P. Super and George F. Gormley, P.C. were on brief for appellant. <

621 F.3d 1343 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Anthony GOMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-11225 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. October 1, 2010. *1344 Linda Julin McNamara, Kathy Peluso, U.S. Atty., Tampa, FL, Simon A. Gaugush, Fort Myers, FL, for U.S.

*571MEMORANDUM ** Louie F. Gomes appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in its action to reduce to judgment unpaid tax assessments and foreclose federal tax liens on Gomes’ property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 541 (9th Cir

MEMORANDUM *** Joseph Gomes (“Gomes”) appeals the 156-month sentence imposed after his original sentence was vacated and remanded by this court pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 *84L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We dismiss Gomes’s appeal b

MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-,-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and United States v. Ameline, No. 02-30326, 2005 WL 350811, 400 F.3d 646 (9th Cir. Feb.9, 2005). VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication

MEMORANDUM ** 1. Gomes argues that his plea was rendered involuntary because the district court participated in plea negotiations, in violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. See United States v. Bruce, 976 F.2d 552, 557-58 (9th Cir.1992). In fact, the district court was not involved at all until Gomes’s change of plea hearing, by which time the agreement had already been negotiated. 2.

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held

305 F.Supp.2d 158 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. Aaron GOMES a/k/a "Lamont Keaton" No. CRIM. 3:98 CR 195(CF). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 17, 2004. *159 *160 John A. Danaher, III, Thomas V. Daily, Hartford, CT, for USA. Jeremiah F. Donovan, Old Saybrook, C

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Peter Gomes Fontes (“Fontes”) challenges his sentence for drug trafficking crimes on the ground that the district court’s finding that the government engaged in sentencing factor manipulation entitles him to a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum. Specifically, Fontes assails the district court’s ultimate conclusion that his pr

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellant James Gomes challenges the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He claims that the evidence, which described a single purchase, showed only a buyer-seller relationship and not the requisite agreement to deal drugs. Because we b

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. On this appeal, four defendants — Joseph Silva, Julio Serpa, Juvenal Quadros, and Joao Gomes — seek review of their convictions for drug trafficking offenses or of their sentences. The case arises out of a large-scale investigation of drug dealing in and around Lowell, Massachusetts, conducted from the late 1980s until August 1996. Because the sufficiency

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

749 F.2d 731 U.S.v.Gomes*** NO. 84-5414 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. NOV 28, 1984 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED.

875 F.2d 871 U.S.v.Gomes (Urban Daniel) NO. 88-1297 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. MAY 22, 1989 1 Appeal From: D.Ariz. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 279 Fed. Appx. 861.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 621 F.3d 1343.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

672 F.2d 901 U. S.v.Gomes 81-1151 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 9/9/81 1 S.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED*

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge Petitioner is a detained unlawful resident who seeks habeas corpus relief. Pending before the Court are respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Docket No. 14) and petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 16). I. Background Manoel Flor Gomes ("petitioner" or "Gomes")