Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “United States v. Gutierrez-Sina”
United States v. Celaya Valenzuelapublic domain
STAHL, Circuit Judge. Beginning in May of 2009, the FBI launched a sting operation, codenamed Operation Dark Water, targeting the Sinaloa Drug Cartel. Undercover agents held themselves out as an organized crime operation, led by an Italian mafia boss who went by the name El Viejo (“the Old Man”), which sought to procure a long-term source of cocaine from the cartel. Among the hi
United States v. Perlazapublic domain
Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 02-50084 v. D.C. No. LEONAR NELLINO SEGURA PERLAZA, CR-00-03209-TJW Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plai
KHANpublic domain
Cite as 26 I&N Dec. 797 (BIA 2016) Interim Decision #3870 Matter of Safraz KHAN, Respondent Decided September 8, 2016 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Immigration Judges do not have authority to adjudicate a request for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(d)(3)(A)(ii) of the I
429 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2004) TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, INC., a foreign corporation; Dan Swearingen, an individual; and John V. Tilton, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of John V. Tilton Jr., deceased, Defendants. No. 5:02 CV 58 OC 10GRJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division. January 21, 2004.
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti