Cases

21-836 (L) United States v. Hawkins In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2021 Nos. 21-836 (L), 21-848 (Con) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHAEL HAWKINS, CAESAR DIAZ, A/K/A SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Defendants-Appella

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-CO-1330 UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. DELONTA K. HAWKINS, A

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On August 13, 2013, Defendant Vernon Hawkins pled guilty to one count of Making a False Statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Presently before the Court are the [58] Final Presentence Investigation Report filed by the United States Probation Office, the Government’s [63] Memora

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jarriette Eurk Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr. United States District Judge After a jury trial the defendants were convicted on all four counts of the superseding indictment charging: (1) conspiracy to commit bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 371; (2) bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B); (3) theft of honest services through bribery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1342 & 1346; and (4) conspiracy to commit theft of hone

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United State

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven Lawrence Hawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-CR-0244 (KBJ) ) WESLEY HAWKINS, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marvin Willie Hawkins, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hawkins has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Robby Keith Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Enrico Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record refl

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jamie Sylvester Hawkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because, as a career offender, Hawkins’ offense level was determined based on his statu

PER CURIAM: Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1,

PER CURIAM: Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1,

PER CURIAM: * Dorothy Ann Hawkins pled guilty to conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and was sentenced to forty-six months’ imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347, 1349. She challenges the district court’s enhancement of her sentence for abuse of a position of trust under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. For the following reasons and for essentially the reasons stated in our opinion filed today in U

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I concur in the court’s judgment that joinder error requires us to vacate Hawkins’s convictions on Counts I and II. I write separately simply to note that this circuit’s approach to Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403 may well have precipitated the error in this case. We have used two interrelated theories in construing th

PER CURIAM: * Dorothy Ann Hawkins pled guilty to conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and was sentenced to forty-six months’ imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347, 1349. She challenges the district court’s enhancement of her sentence for abuse of a position of trust under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. For the following reasons and for essentially the reasons stated in our opinion filed today in U

ORDER Kentaro Hawkins was sentenced to a total of 151 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release after he pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing and distributing crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The prison term was later reduced after Hawkins’s base offense level was lowered by a retroactive amendment to the guidelines, see 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.11, and in March 2008 he was rel

ORDER Kentaro Hawkins was sentenced to a total of 151 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release after he pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing and distributing crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The prison term was later reduced after Hawkins’s base offense level was lowered by a retroactive amendment to the guidelines, see 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.11, and in March 2008 he was rel

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I concur in the court’s judgment that joinder error requires us to vacate Hawkins’ convictions on Counts I and II. I write separately simply to note that this circuit’s approach to Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403 may well have precipitated the error in this case. We have used two interrelated theories in construing