Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. HORSCH”
Satsky v. United Statespublic domain
993 F.Supp. 1027 (1998) Linda SATSKY v. UNITED STATES of America. No. Civ.A. G-97-098. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. February 6, 1998. Newton Boris Schwartz, Sr., Houston, TX, Danny M. Sheena, Portis and Associates, Houston, TX, for plaintiffs. Michael H. Johnston, Sullins Johnston Rohrbach and Magers, Houston, TX, for Hermann
United Proteins, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.public domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Larson, J.: This case arises from the.contamination of the Ogal-lala aquifer under plaintiff United Proteins, Inc.’s (UPI) pet food plant by hexavalent chromium released by defendant Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland). UPI sought damages for holding costs it allegedly incurred due to its inability to sell.the plant on. theories of trespass and intentional private nuis
Blanch v. Trans Union, LLCpublic domain
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE April Blanch brought suit against numerous defendants, under the Fair Credit *791Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., related to alleged errors in her c
Pedro v. Equifax, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a class action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is before the Court on the Defendants Equifax, Inc. and *1366TransUnion, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 38]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants Equifax, Inc. and Tran-sUnion, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss [D
Kathleen N. Pedro v. Transunion LLCpublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether a consumer reporting agency adopted an objectively unreasonable interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., when it stated on a consumer’s credit report that she was an authorized user of her parents’ credit card account. Kathleen Pedro’s parents listed her as an authorized user on their credit card account, whic
Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currencypublic domain
728 N.W.2d 510 (2007) Richard J. JACOBSON, Appellant, v. $55,900 in U.S. CURRENCY, Respondent. No. A05-60. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 15, 2007. *513 Randall D.B. Tigue, Minneapolis, for appellant. James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Atty., Margaret M. Horsch, Asst. County Atty., Kathryn M. Keene, Asst. County Atty., D
Gottsacker v. Monnierpublic domain
281 Wis.2d 361 (2005) 2005 WI 69 697 N.W.2d 436 Gregory GOTTSACKER and New Jersey LLC, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Julie A. MONNIER, Paul Gottsacker and 2005 New Jersey LLC, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners. No. 2003AP457. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 14, 2005. Decided June 8, 2005. <
Hrebal v. Seterus, Inc.public domain
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This litigation arises under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"). In essence, the parties dispute whether Defendant Seterus, Inc. ("Seterus") provided "inaccurate" or "materially misleading" information to the three major credit reporting agencies ("CRAs") in 2016, when Seterus reported Plaintiff Charles Hrebal ("Hrebal") as delinquent on his mortgage, shortly after Hrebal succes
Hoffmann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM Gerald Austin McHugh, United States District Judge In 2012, Wells Fargo brought a mortgage foreclosure action against Sonya Hoffmann, but lost following a bench trial. In 2016, it sued her again on the same debt, prompting Hoffmann to file the present action, in which she charges (for a second time) that Wells Fargo and its lawyers violated various consumer protection laws. Before me now are Mo
SanMiguel v. Grimaldipublic domain
SanMiguel v Grimaldi (2025 NY Slip Op 05780) SanMiguel v Grimaldi 2025 NY Slip Op 05780 Decided on October 21, 2025 Court of Appeals Singas Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.public domain
136 F.Supp.2d 1201 (2001) PLASTIC PACKAGING CORP., Plaintiff, v. SUN CHEMICAL CORP., Defendant. No. 00-2569-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 6, 2001. *1202 Joel K. Goldman, Husch & Eppenberger, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Timothy M. O'Brien, B. Kirsten Ehlen, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Over
Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.public domain
169 P.3d 1052 (2007) Loyd SMITH, et al., Individually and as Representatives of Those Persons Similarly Situated, Appellees/Cross-appellants, v. KANSAS GAS SERVICE COMPANY; ONEOK, Inc.; Mid Continent Market Center, Inc.; ONEOK Gas Storage, LLC; ONEOK Gas Storage Holdings, Inc.; ONEOK Gas Transportation, LLC, Appellants/Cross-appellees, and Western Resources, Inc., Appellee/Cross-appellant. No. 94,602.
DeSpiegelaere v. Killionpublic domain
24 Kan. App.2d 542 (1997) 947 P.2d 1039 THOMAS J. and HOLLY K. DeSPIEGELAERE, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. MARK R. and MARILYN G. KILLION, Appellants/ Cross-Appellees. No. 75,786. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed November 21, 1997. *543 Steven B. Moore, of Rasmussen & Barton, L.L.C.,
Monsanto Co. v. Scruggspublic domain
342 F.Supp.2d 584 (2004) MONSANTO COMPANY Plaintiff v. Mitchell SCRUGGS, Eddie Scruggs, and Scruggs Family Farm Supply Defendants No. Civ.A.3:00 CV 161 P-A. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division. July 6, 2004. *586 Michael Noel Watts, Robert Bradley Best, Oxford, MS, Frank S. Thackston, Jr., Lake Tindal
Perlman v. Permonite Manufacturing Co.public domain
568 F.Supp. 222 (1983) Mac R. PERLMAN, Sylvia Perlman, and Alan J. Pearlman, Plaintiffs, v. PERMONITE MANUFACTURING CO. and Midland Enterprises, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. H79-498. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. June 29, 1983. *223 Duane W. Hartman, Blachly, Tabor, Bozik & Hartman, Valparaiso, I
Brown v. Statepublic domain
On direct appeal to the El Paso Court of Appeals, as well as in the petition for discretionary review that has been filed in this cause, it was urged on behalf of David Brown, appellant, that the trial court erred in refusing to admit at the guilt stage of the trial the testimony of Dr. Harmon Hosch, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Texas at El Paso. Had Dr. Hosch been permitted to testify, he would have testified, inter alia, on the subject of the unreliabili
Eckholt v. American Business Information, Inc.public domain
873 F.Supp. 510 (1994) Robert J. ECKHOLT, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BUSINESS INFORMATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-2440-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 2, 1994. *511 *512 *513 John M. Edgar, Steven E. Mauer, Matthew V. Ba
Gabaldoni v. BOARD OF PHYSICIANS QUALITY ASSURANCEpublic domain
785 A.2d 771 (2001) 141 Md. App. 259 Louis V. GABALDONI v. BOARD OF PHYSICIAN QUALITY ASSURANCE. No. 241, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 28, 2001. *772 Conrad W. Varner (Varner, Kaslick & Goundry on the brief), Frederick, for appellant. Thomas W. Keech, Asst. At
714 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2010) COFFEYVILLE RESOURCES REFINING & MARKETING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Illinois Union Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., and Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 08-1204-WEB-KMH. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 28, 2010.
498 N.W.2d 260 (1993) In the Matter of the LEONA CARLISLE TRUST CREATED UNDER THE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 9, 1985. No. C0-92-1798. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 23, 1993. *262 Randy F. Boggio, Leigh D. Mathison, Garvey & Mathison, Bloomington, for appellant James R. Carlisle. James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Att