Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STARITA, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. James T. HUMPHREY Master-at-Arms Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy

CCA 20160518. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied without prejudice to resubmitting a motion that complies vrith C.A-A.F. Rule 21(f)(1)—(8).

CCA 20160518. Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review granted.

MORITZ, Circuit Judge. Reginald Humphrey appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with one count of producing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Humphrey asserts the district court erred in rejecting his argument that applying § 2251(a) to the intrastate production of child pornography violates the Commerce Clause. Finding no b

608 F.3d 955 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Dence HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 08-5850, 08-5867. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 11, 2010. *956 ON BRIEF: J. Patten Brown, III, Law Offices of Pat Brown, Hartford, Connecticut, for Appellant. Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., Erin J. May

MEMORANDUM ** James Lee Humphrey appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *786L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Humphrey’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritoriou

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1 TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, United States Circuit Judge. This case is before us for a third time,2 this time on remand from the United States Supreme Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Humphrey, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 104

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Montel Humphrey appeals his 240-month sentence imposed following this Court’s remand for re-sentencing after his conviction by a jury for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, possession of a firearm after a prior felony conviction, and conspiring to commit money laundering. Humphrey claims that he was denied due process of law during his

ORDER Arindus Humphrey appeals the sentence imposed upon his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine and cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the *691Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral ar

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. I. Defendant-Appellant Vashaun Humphrey was indicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Humphrey moved to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search performed when the vehicle in which he was a passenger was stopped for a traffic violation. The district court denied Humphrey’s motion

MEMORANDUM ** Anthony Leonard Humphrey appeals a 27 month sentence imposed following his conviction by guilty plea to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we review de novo, United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 1998), and we affirm. Humphrey contends that

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ;  3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH   1R

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1R Y 

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH APR 4 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, Arindus “Red” Humphrey was convicted of one count of conspiracy to possess cocaine and cocaine base and ordered to forfeit certain items of real and personal property. Humphrey appealed his conviction and sentence, asserting, inter alia, that the district court erred in the calculation of the amount of cocaine attributable to him. On March 28, 2000, we affirme

*329ORDER In April 1998 Walter M. Humphrey pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Because the government did not move for a substantial-assistance departure in this prosecution, the district court determined it lacked the authority to depart downward under United States Sentencing Guideline § 5

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ------------------------------------------- No. 94-6984 -------------------------------------------- FILED

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Patrick L. Humphrey, argues on appeal that the district court failed to meet the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 when accepting his guilty plea. We see no plain error and affirm. Background Humphrey was charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute,

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Bruce Henry Humphrey and Fáy Carolyn Humphrey operated a loan brokerage service that was essentially a scam. They appeal from a jury verdict finding them guilty of seven counts of mail fraud and three counts of wire fraud. They also challenge their sentences. After reviewing the record, studying the briefs, and considering the arguments made to thi

103 F.3d 126 U.S.v.Humphrey* NO. 96-30578 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 25, 1996 Appeal From: E.D.La., No. 95-CR-315-E 1 AFFIRMED.