Cases

PER CURIAM: Matthew K. Hube, appointed counsel for Christopher L. Haley in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Haley requests the appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance. Our independent review of t

CCA 37565. Upon further consideration of the granted issue (69 M.J. 473) in light of United States v. Beaty, 70 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2011), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings, but reversed as to sentence, and that the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals to reassess the sentence or to order a

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Noah Haley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haley has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Haley’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally

529 F.3d 1308 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Wayne HALEY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5041. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 25, 2008. *1309 Leena Alam, Assistant United States Attorney, (David E. O'Meilia, United States Attorney, Northern District of Oklahoma, on the brief),

92 F.3d 1201 U.S.v.Haley* NO. 95-9333 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 17, 1996 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga., No. 95-00169-1-CR-JEC 2

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM ZATKOFF, District Judge. On November 25, 1987, the Defendant William A. Haley, Jr. was indicted on eleven counts for violating various federal criminal laws. At the time of the indictment, the Defendant was a District Judge with the 36th District Court in the State of Michigan. In its most rudimentary form, the Defendant was charged with soliciting and accepting a series of bribes to

826 F.2d 11 U.S.v.Haley* NO. 87-3208 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JUL 28, 1987 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2 AFF

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

DECISION McMILLEN, District Judge. Defendant Haley filed numerous pretrial motions in this case which were assigned to Magistrate Gotschall for a recommendation. Defendant Berry filed a motion to dismiss and other pretrial motions which were assigned to Magistrate Lefkow. Since the motions cover substantially the same subject matters, we will decide them together.

744 F.2d 95 *U.S.v.Haley 83-3751 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 9/5/84 1 M.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.

521 F.Supp. 290 (1981) UNITED STATES of America v. Millard Clifford HALEY, Francis William Hewes, Howard E. Caldwell, William T. Brooks, Gene M. Simpson, Walter Langford and Charles Franklin Caldwell. Crim. A. No. CR81-09A. United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 27, 1981. *291 Howard J. Manchel, Gig

661 F.2d 943 U. S.v.Haley 80-1814 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 9/4/81 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

504 F.Supp. 1124 (1981) UNITED STATES of America v. Millard Clifford HALEY, Francis William Hewes, II, Andrew J. Delosky, Howard E. Caldwell, Ted Michael Ferrell, a/k/a Franklin K. Harris, Robert Lee Nations, Craig A. Cloninger, William T. Brooks, Gene M. Simpson, Thomas Glenn Chester, James F. Brannon, Jr., Luther Eugene Hickey, Carl S. DeMarchi, Frank Pytryga, William L. Warner, Walter Langford, John Carroll Craver, Roger Boone, Charles Frankli

748 F.2d 690 U.S.v.Haley (Douglas Frank) NO. 82-8435 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. NOV 15, 1984 Appeal From: S.D.Ga., 743 F.2d 862 1 Denials of Rehearing En Banc.

542 U.S. 956 HALEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-9064. Supreme Court of United States. August 2, 2004. 1 Petition for rehearing denied. 2 Reported below: 541 U. S. 966.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

541 U.S. 966 HALEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-9064. Supreme Court of United States. March 29, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 74 Fed. Appx. 271.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.