⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Hardimon”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 406 F. App'x 62
ORDER A jury convicted Demond Hardimon of conspiring to distribute more than one kilogram of heroin, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. The district court initially found that Hardimon had a prior state felony drug conviction and sentenced him to the 20-year mandatory minimum, see § 841(b). We upheld Hardimon’s conviction, but vacated his sentence and remanded so that the district court could determine whether Hardimon q
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 329 F. App'x 660
ORDER Demond Hardimon was convicted after a jury trial of conspiring to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. The district court found that Hardimon had a prior state conviction for a felony drug offense and sentenced him to the mandatory minimum term of 240 months’ imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Hardimon challenges his conviction on appeal, contending there was a fa
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 329 F. App'x 660
ORDER Demond Hardimon was convicted after a jury trial of conspiring to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. The district court found that Hardimon had a prior state conviction for a felony drug offense and sentenced him to the mandatory minimum term of 240 months’ imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Hardimon challenges his conviction on appeal, contending there was a fa
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN HARDIMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0971 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) F I L E D NOV 26 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy ¢V Courts for the District of Columbia Novemberl/ , 2018 [Dkt. # 23] Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has sued the United States under the Freedom of lnformation Act (“FGIA”). The complaint stems from plaintiffs FOIA requests submitted to the Int
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 569 U.S. 983; 185 L. Ed. 2d 1083; 133 S. Ct. 2362; 81 U.S.L.W. 3638; 2013 WL 1335653; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3593
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-11-07 · Published · cited 23× · 700 F.3d 940; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22834; 2012 WL 5416460
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The defendant, a chiropractor, pleaded guilty to defrauding health insurers and to money laundering and was sentenced to 70 months in prison (the bottom of the applicable guidelines range) and to pay restitution' of almost $2 million. In his guilty plea he waived his right to appeal; but shortly after pleading guilty he moved to retract the plea on the grou
Dixon v. Hardimonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-09-06 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 986; 123 S. Ct. 25
536 U.S. 986 DIXONv.HARDIMON. No. 01-9092. Supreme Court of the United States. September 6, 2002. 1 535 U. S. 1083. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Dixon v. Hardimonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 1083
Ct. App. Minn. Certio-rari denied.
Dixon v. Hardimonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 1083
Ct. App. Minn. Certio-rari denied.
Dixon v. Hardimonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 535 U.S. 1083; 122 S. Ct. 1973
535 U.S. 1083 DIXONv.HARDIMON. No. 01-9092. Supreme Court of the United States. May 20, 2002. 1 Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.
People v. Hardimonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-07-17 · Published · cited 10× · 2017 IL App (3d) 120772
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-03-19 · Published · cited 8× · 95 F.4th 1130
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2348 HERBERT HARDIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RIVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023-08-23 · Published · cited 1× · 79 F.4th 889
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2366 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEJMAN KAMKARIAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2026-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
24-1871 United States v. Boria United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: October 24, 2025 Decided: February 4, 2026 No. 24-1871 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. STEVE BORIA, AKA CHROME,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-06-13 · Published · cited 2× · 892 F.3d 910
Per Curiam. Todd Dyer, the defendant in this consolidated appeal, challenges the denials of his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas. Under a written agreement, Dyer pled guilty to wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343 , and unlawful financial transactions,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-06-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-1580 and 17-1776 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TODD A. DYER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD A. STENSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 6× · 934 F.3d 740
Ripple, Circuit Judge. In June 2017, a federal grand jury indicted Rex Hopper on one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), 846 and
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REX A. HOPPER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 20× · 795 F.3d 947; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13068; 2015 WL 4529379
OPINION MELLOY, Circuit Judge: Defendant Huey Carter timely filed a direct appeal following a guilty plea. He asserts he was under the influence of prescription drugs at the time he entered his plea. Carter asks us to vacate the plea because he contends the district court insufficiently inquired as to the effect of those drugs at his plea hearing. Without a