Cases

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

2021 WI App 57 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP309 Complete Title of Case: BETH CULVER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. ADILAKSHMI KAZA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, KENOSHA MEDICAL CENTER AND UNITED HOSPITAL SYSTEM AND MEDICAL CO

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. February 18, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a

NEUBAUER, P.J. ¶ 1. Cintas Corporation No. 2 (Cintas No. 2) appeals from a default judgment entered in favor of its employee, Robert Johnson. Cintas No. 2 contends the default judgment, entered immediately after the trial court permitted amendment of the pleadings to name Cintas No. 2, is void because the original summons and complaint named the wrong corporate entity — its parent, Cintas Corporation. We agree. Because personal ju

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. February 18, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a

783 N.W.2d 450 (2010) 2010 WI App 66 Kalvin LOPPNOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, United Healthcare Insurance Company, Involuntary-Plaintiff, v. Steven BIELIK, Defendant-Respondent,[†] James R. Swan, Paul R. Kittel, Adler Lentz, Benjamin P. Feutz, Stephen K. Musto, ABC Insurance Company, DEF Insurance Company, GHI Insurance Company, JKL Insurance Company, MNO Insurance Company and PQR Insurance Company, Defendan

ANDERSON, EJ. ¶ 1. First Union Securities, Inc.1 appeals from a circuit court order denying its motion to reopen a default judgment entered in favor of Gary Richards. First Union contends that the circuit court's determination that it waived its jurisdictional defense of insufficient service of process was in error. First Union then argues that the service of process upon it was improper because Richa

429 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2006) Francisco SALAS, Plaintiff, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a state governmental agency; Richard F. Raemisch, individually; William A. Grosshans, individually; Denise A. Symdon, individually; Marie Finley, individually; and Leann Moberly, individually, Defendants. No. 05-C-399-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. April 25, 2006.

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTORS’ MOTIONS FOR CERTAIN RELIEF AGAINST WELLS FARGO SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Since this case’s inception in 2005, it has been fraught with litigation, failed media-tions, discovery disputes, accusations of attorney misconduct and otherwise tumultuous actions. In 2013, these proceedings eventually culminated in this Court’s disal-lowance of the proof of claim filed on b

236 Wis.2d 588 (2000) 2000 WI 93 614 N.W.2d 388 William J. VINCENT and Judy S. Vincent, individually and as parents of Tonya M. Vincent, Carol Bartlein, individually and as parent of Kurt Bartlein, Sara Bartlein and Kimberly Bartlein, Pam Britten, individually and as parent of Travis Britten, Cortney Britten and Taylor Britten, Karen Drazkowski, individually and as parent of Steve Drazkowski and Ann Drazkow