Cases

HENRY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring on other grounds in part: I concur that perjury at a suppression hearing is covered by U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. I also concur that we strongly prefer specific findings by the district court when it enhances a sentence. As the majority opinion clearly states, the purpose of this court’s holding in United States v. Massey, 48 F.3d 1560 (10th Cir.199

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

770 F.2d 161 U.S.v.Hawthorne 84-5202 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 7/18/85 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

729 F.2d 780 U.S.v.Hawthorne* NO. 83-5272 United States Court of Appeals,eleventh Circuit. MAR 06, 1984 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2

720 F.2d 684 U. S.v.Hawthorne 83-5129 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 10/7/83 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

875 F.2d 873 U.S.v.Hawthorne Electric Corp.** NO. 88-5739 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. MAY 03, 1989 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, JR., Circuit Judge. Appellant Sylvane Hawthorne appeals from the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion for correction of sentence requesting a reduction of the amount of restitution imposed as a condition of her probationary sentence. We must decide

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 595.

751 F.2d 391 U.S.v.Hawthorne (James D.) NO. 84-1028 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit NOV 29, 1984 1 Appeal From: D.Nev. 2 AFFIRMED.

AMENDED OPINION GORDON THOMPSON, Jr., District Judge. Defendants moved for dismissal of the indictment against them on the ground that James L. Duchnick and Richard D. Huffman, special assistants to the United States Attorney who appeared before the grand jury, were not properly authorized to do so under 28 U.S.C. § 515. The defendants contended that the letters from the Attorney General, which appoint

549 F.2d 797 U. S.v.Hawthorne No. 76-1960 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 2/23/77 1 W.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

523 F.Supp.2d 621 (2007) Sylvia HAWTHORNE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:06CV1590. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 10, 2007. *622 Patricia M. Ritzert, Climaco, Lefkowitz, Peca, Wilcox & Garofoli, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff. Gustave C. Martschink, III, Al

Appellant Hawthorne was charged by indictment with armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence ("PFCV"). A jury found him guilty of PFCV as charged, and on the armed robbery count it found him guilty of the lesser included offense of robbery. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, appellant argues that the trial court erred (1) by raising sua sponte the issue of whether the government wished it to instruct the jury on the lesser included

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

540 U.S. 884 HAWTHORNEv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-5033. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 316 F. 3

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 558 U.S. 995, 130 S. Ct. 499, 175 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7831.