Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Hemphill”
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Case No. 1:21-cr-555-RCL PAMELA ANNE HEMPHILL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER For her involvement in the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol, Defendant Pamela Hemphill pleaded guilty to a single petty offense. She received a
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Jeron Hemphill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark Benjamin Hemphill seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) *757motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issu
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
ORDER John Hemphill was indicted for mail fraud and false impersonation of a federal officer after conducting a multi-year scheme in which he claimed ownership of certain properties as a “receiver” for the federal government, filed fraudulent deeds with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds (“CCRD”), and duped unsuspecting buyers into paying him for properties that he had no authority to convey. He proceeded to trial pro se, with the assi
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GWENDOLYN M. HEMPHILL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Criminal Case No. 03-516-3 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GWENDOL YN M. HEMPHILL ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No.1 :08-cv-00624 (RJL) ) Criminal Case No. 03-cr-516 (RJL) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
514 F.3d 1350 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Gwendolyn M. HEMPHILL and James Odell Baxter, Appellants. Nos. 06-3088, 06-3089, 07-3016. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 15, 2007. Decided February 8, 2008. *1351 *1352
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Mark Benjamin Hemphill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as untimely. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a co
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
ORDER Wade Hemphill was convicted of cocaine conspiracy and distribution charges. He moved for a new trial claiming ineffective assistance of counsel because his appointed counsel allegedly failed to develop his proposed coercion defense. The district court denied the motion, citing a lack of prejudice. Hemphill appeals, challenging that ruling and the district court’s drug-quantity calculation at sentencing, and we affirm.
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
OPINION DOWD, Judge. Defendant-appellant Stanson Hemphill (Hemphill) challenges his convictions and sentences on charges of bank robbery, conspiracy to commit bank robbery, and use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. After a thorough review of the trial transcript in light of the claimed errors, we affirm. I. Hemphill was one of three defendants named in a three
Hemphill v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
810 F.2d 197 U.S.v.Hemphill* NO. 86-4434 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JAN 15, 1987 1 Appeal From: N.D.Miss. 2
United States v. Emmanuel Hemphillpublic domain
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. Emmanuel Hemphill pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. The district court sentenced him consistent with the plea agreement to concurrent terms of five years on each count. Hemphill now appeals, contending that the district court imprope
Hemphill v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Hemphill v. United Statespublic domain
601 F.Supp.2d 249 (2009) Gwendolyn M. HEMPHILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Civil Case No. 1:08-cv-00624 (RJL). Criminal Case No. 03-cr-516 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 9, 2009. *250 Gwendolyn M. Hemphill, pro se. Anthony Michael Alexis, Sr., James W. Cooper, Jea
Hemphill v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Hemphillpublic domain
679 F.2d 252 *U. S.v.Hemphill 81-5650 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eleventh Circuit 6/10/82 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------
Hemphill v. New Yorkpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Hemphill v. New Yorkpublic domain
1/21/2022 2:44:38 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 20-637.pdf 20-637_new.pdf versus 32 pages (181 KB) 32 pages (184 KB)
Hemphill v. New Yorkpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit