Cases

ORDER Pedro Hernandez-Lopez, an undocumented Mexican citizen, was arrested in Chicago in 2009 and charged in state court with aggravated robbery. That charge remains pending, but because Hernandez-Lopez already had been removed from the United States three times before this arrest, he was charged in federal court with being in the United States illegally after removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He pleaded guilty to that charge.

761 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Roberto Javier HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant. No. CR 10-0769 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. December 7, 2010. *1177 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Norman Cairns, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, Plaintiff, Brian

MEMORANDUM ** Roberto Hernandez-Lopez appeals from the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to f

MEMORANDUM ** Roberto Hernandez-Lopez appeals his guilty plea conviction and the 55-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez-Lopez’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that there are no issues to raise on appeal. As par

820 F.2d 1230 */**U.S.v.Hernandez-Lopez 86-8731 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 5/29/87 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3468 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Marco Antonio Hernandez Lopez

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge: The United States prosecuted these four defendants—Lopez Hernandez, Hernandez Almaraz, Aguilar Lopez, and Savala Cisne-ros—under the Maritime Drug Law En-forcemént Act (MDLEA), which criminalizes an individual’s possessing with intent to distribute a controlled substance “[wjhile on board a covered vessel,” which includes “a vessel subject to the jurisdi

MEMORANDUM *** In adopting the sentencing recommendations and findings in the probation office’s pre-sentence report on the appellant Lopez’ guilty plea, the district court satisfied the requirement in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) that the court rule on disputed portions of the report. Lopez objected to the details surrounding two of his prior criminal convictions, which he contended dist

MEMORANDUM *** In adopting the sentencing recommendations and findings in the probation office’s pre-sentence report on the appellant Lopez’ guilty plea, the district court satisfied the requirement in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) that the court rule on disputed portions of the report. Lopez objected to the details surrounding two of his prior criminal convictions, which he contended dist

Opinion Ronald B. King, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge In this adversary proceeding, Plaintiff, Magdalena Lopez (“Magdalena”), alleged that the Defendants, Jorge Quiroz Hernandez (“Jorge”) and Alejandro Quiroz-Pedrazzi (“Alejandro”), fraudulently induced her to enter into a frozen yogurt venture that ultimately failed and caused her to lose approximately $671,270.00. After Magdalena filed a state co

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 1177 LOPEZ-HERNANDEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-8362. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 2005. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 984.

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Lopez-Hernandez appeals the district court’s 69-month sentenced, with three years supervised release, for re-entry after deportation and attempted reentry after deportation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s determination of whether the defendant has validly waived his rights, de novo. United States v. Anglin, 215 F.3d 1064, 1066 (9th

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 858 LOPEZ HERNANDEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-10925. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 86 Fed. Appx. 739.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 1141 LOPEZ HERNANDEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-7760. Supreme Court of United States. January 13, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2