Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Hills Coal Company, Inc.”
Aracoma Coal Co. v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Wade Boyce v. Quinwood Coal Company, LLC, and Christopher Sargent v. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.public domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Fall 2025 Term FILED _____________________ October 1, 2025 Nos. 24-ICA-346 and 24-ICA-440 released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY
Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Wrigley's 7-711, Inc. (In re Licking River Mining, LLC)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wrigley’s 7-711, Inc.’s, (“Wrigley” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 25 (“Motion”) ] and supporting Memorandum [ECF No. 25-1 (“Memorandum”) ]. In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 27 (“Amended Complaint” or “AC”)], Plaintiff Phaedra Spradlin, chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”),
Cedar Coal Company v. DOWCPpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1063 Doc: 67 Filed: 03/06/2026 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1063 CEDAR COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Georgia Power Co.public domain
WYNN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In 1983 and 1984, Georgia Power Company (“Georgia Power”) sold Ward Transformer Company (“Ward Transformer”) over one hundred electrical transformers at “scrapping” auctions. The used transformers were in various stages of disrepair and contained varying amounts of oil tainted with polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) — potent human carcinogens “linked to skin cancer, liver cance
Consolidation Coal Company v. Georgia Power Companypublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1603 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Plaintiff, and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY; AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATIO
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA WILLIAMS ALASKA PETROLEUM, ) INC. and THE WILLIAMS ) Supreme Court No. S-17772 COMPANIES, INC.,
Dillon Trust Company LLC v. United Statespublic domain
No. 17-1898T, 17-2022T, 17-2023T (Decided: November 10, 2022) ************************** DILLON TRUST COMPANY LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, Keywords: federal income tax; I.R.C. § 6603 v. deposits; underpayment interest; int
*245MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Trustee’s First Amended Complaint. [ECF Nos. 25 and 25-1 (memorandum in support, hereafter the “Motion”).] In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 24 (“Amend
Joshua J. Angel v. Warrior Met Coal Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSHUA J. ANGEL, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0235-SG ) WARRIOR MET COAL INC., APOLLO ) MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES ) MANAGEMENT LLC, CASPIAN ) CAPITAL L
Consolidation Coal Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION & ORDER FUTEY, Judge. These cases come before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed in all of the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs are coal producers that believe fees they paid violate the Export Clause of the Constitution. The Court had stayed the cases pending resolution of Consolidation Coal Company v. United States, No. 01-254
Mann Constr., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0041p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MANN CONSTRUCTION, INC.; BROOK WOOD; │ KIMBERLY WOOD; LEE COUGHLIN; DEBBIE
Aberry Coal, Inc. v. Joseph Flemingpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge. Under the Black Lung Benefits Act (“BLBA”), an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) must determine, using a reasonable method of calculation and based on substantial evidence, how long a coal worker was employed in coal-mine work. If the length of employment was more than fifteen years, the worker is entitled to a
782 A.2d 68 (2001) PLEASANT HILLS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and Gary C. Hartman, v. PUBLIC AUDITORIUM AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH and Allegheny County Limbach Company, Pittsburgh Pirates Baseball Club and Dick Corporation/Barton Malow Company. Appeal of Public Auditorium Authority of Pittsburgh. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 7, 2000. Decided August 10, 2001.<
Antelope Coal Company/Rio v. Goodinpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 3, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCU
The Coal Creek Company v. Anderson County, Tennesseepublic domain
10/05/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 10, 2017 Session THE COAL CREEK COMPANY v. ANDERSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 190298-1 John F. Weaver, Chancellor No. E2017-0
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1871 DRUMMOND COAL SALES, INC., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant. No. 20-1920 DRUMMOND COAL SALES, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant,
Rudolph Betancourt v. Indian Hills Plaza LLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0266p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, │ Plaintiff-A
Shell Oil Company v. United Statespublic domain
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.-, Damages Caused By Breach Of Contract; Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) 702 (Experts); Remand. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER ON REMAND REGARDING BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES BRADEN, Judge. <
Rollock Company v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. The dispute in this case is over terms of a property acquisition and relocation contract between the government and the plaintiffs, the Rollock Company, Anthony Kordell, and Christopher Kordell (collectively “the Rollock plaintiffs” or “Rollock”). The National Park Service (“NPS”) purchased land owned by the Rollock plainti