Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the government’s [240] Motion for Restitution, and the government’s [250] Supplemental Motion for Restitution. The government seeks restitution for five victims from the “Misty,” “8 Kids,” “Sponge B,” and “Angela” series pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 22

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Paul David Hite was convicted by a jury on two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) on February 13, 2013. On July 2, 2013, this Court sentenced Dr. Hite to 264 months of imprisonment followed by supervised release for a period of 120

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. 12-65 (CKK) PAUL DAVID HITE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 13, 2013) Defendant Paul David Hite is charged by Superseding Indictment with two counts of attempted coercion and entic

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Paul David Hite’s [186] Motion for an Order Setting Conditions of Release Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142. Dr. Hite seeks release pending re-trial, arguing that conditions of release can be set that reasonably assure his appearance at re-trial

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the memorandum of law and fact filed by appellant, the memorandum of law and fact filed by ap-pellee, and the reply. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s detention order filed December 10, 2014, be affirmed. The district court did not

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s oral motion for a judgment of acquittal following the close of the Government’s evidence, on which the Court reserved its decision pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(b). Based on the evidence in the record, the parties’ arguments,

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the motion for release pending appeal filed by appellant, the memorandum of law and fact filed by appellee, and the reply. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 30, 2013, be affirmed. Appellant has not “clearly shown th

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Defendant Paul David Hite is charged by Superseding Indictment with two *114counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The Government alleges that the Defendant engaged in a series of online chats and telephone conversations with an undercove

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Defendant Paul David Hite is charged by superseding indictment with two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Superseding Indictment, ECF No. [10], at 1-2. The Defendant previously moved to dismiss both counts of the superseding indictment on the

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Defendant Paul David Hite was charged by Superseding Indictment with two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of both counts. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s [98] Rule 29 Motion for

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Defendant Paul David Hite is charged by Superseding Indictment with two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Presently before the Court is the Government’s [39] Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony from Dr. Fred Berlin. T

ORDER As he was strolling through a neighborhood in Mishawaka, Indiana, convicted felon Kevin Hite hatched a plan to commit yet another crime. He chose a house at random, hurled a brick through a window to gain entry, and made off with roughly $8,000 worth of jewelry and a .32 caliber Smith & Wesson revolver. But the police caught up with him a few minutes later and, after a short chase, took him into custody.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2808 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM B. HITE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2808 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM B. HITE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 8, 2014 Decided October 21, 2014 No. 13-3066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. PAUL DAVID HITE, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:12-cr-00065-1)

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. *1158 WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial, Paul David Hite was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) of attempting to persuade a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity. Hite’s conviction was based on Internet

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 546.

53 B.R. 21 (1985) In re Joseph Hunter HITE, Debtor. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Hunter HITE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 381-02126, Adv. No. 383-0192. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. July 2, 1985. *22 Sylvia Ford Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff. C. Kinian Cosner

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-­rari denied.

543 U.S. 1103 HITEv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5481. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 364 F. 3d 874; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remande