Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Hossain”
United States v. Hossainpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Anwar Hossain appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on July, 29, 2008, following a plea of guilty, of conspiring to commit wire fraud. The District Court sentenced him principally to imprisonment for one year and one day; three years of supervised release; and a special assessment of $100. He challenges his conviction on the grounds that his sentence was procedurally unreasonable. W
United States v. Hossainpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Anwar Hossain appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on July, 29, 2008, following a plea of guilty, of conspiring to commit wire fraud. The District Court sentenced him principally to imprisonment for one year and one day; three years of supervised release; and a special assessment of $100. He challenges his conviction on the grounds that his sentence was procedurally unreasonable. W
Hossain v. Tarangopublic domain
PER CURIAM: * After he was denied citizenship, Plaintiff-Appellant Mohammed Zahid Hossain sued Defendants-Appellees seeking to be declared a citizen of the United States of America. He had been denied citizenship through the administrative process for failure to prove that he has the good moral character required to become a citizen. After both sides filed competing motions for s
RAGGI, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants Advance Pharmaceutical, Inc.; its president, Tasrin Hossain; and her husband and the corporation’s vice-president, Liaquat Hossain, appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Ivan L.R. Lemelle, Judge 1
Hossain v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zakir Mohamed Hossain (“Hossain”), a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of a December 9, 2005 order of the BIA affirming, without opinion, the July 21, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Gabriel C. Videla denying petitioner’s application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention *37Against Torture (“CAT”).
Hossain v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review be DENIED and that the motion for a stay of deportation be DENIED. On behalf of himself and his family, Mohammed Iqbal Hossain, a native and citi*47zen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of a March 31, 2003 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“B
Hossain v. Gonzalespublic domain
Petitioner Sabuj Hossain (“Hossain” or “petitioner”) petitions for review of a January 31, 2003 order of the BIA, denying petitioner’s motion to reopen and reconsider the BIA’s prior October 9, 2002 decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Hossain, a citizen of Bangladesh, claims that members of a rival political party razed his shop in Bangladesh and murdered his father, and that h
Hossain-Bagum v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Sumon Hossain-Bagum, also known as Johirul Islam, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the February 23, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Barbara A. Nelson, denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Sumon Hossaim-Bagum, No. A98 556 959 (B.I.A. Feb. 29, 20
Hossain-Bagum v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Sumon Hossain-Bagum, also known as Johirul Islam, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the February 23, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Barbara A. Nelson, denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Sumon Hossaim-Bagum, No. A98 556 959 (B.I.A. Feb. 29, 20
Hossain v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mohammad Anwar Hossain, native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of a March 23, 2006 order of the BIA denying his motion to remand and affirming the October 18, 2004, decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Robert D. Weisel denying Hossain’s applications for asy*21lum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“
Hossain v. Immigration & Naturalization Servicepublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Matter of Hossain v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Matter of Hossain v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 03251) Matter of Hossain v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 03251 Decided on May 29, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
United States v. Oliveirapublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Brockton, Massachusetts police arrested Caetano Oliveira in August 2016 while executing a search warrant on an apartment in which drugs, drug paraphernalia, guns, and ammunition were found. Following a federal indictment, Oliveira pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a handgun, a pistol, and twenty rounds of ammunition in violation of
Hossain v. Steadmanpublic domain
ORDER CALLIE V.S. GRANADE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment of the defendants, John W. Steadman, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Dean of the College of Engineering of the University of South Alabama (“Stead-man”), and Bob Riley, Joseph Morton, Christie Miree, John M. Peek, Dr. Stephen P. Furr, Bettye R. Maye, James
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hossainpublic domain
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Hossain (2020 NY Slip Op 05886) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Hossain 2020 NY Slip Op 05886 Decided on October 21, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
American Furukawa, Inc. v. Hossainpublic domain
Opinion and Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings [30] GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. I. Introduction . American Furukawa, Inc. (“Furukawa” or “Plaintiff’) commenced the instant action against its former employee, Isthihar Hossain (“Defendant”), on September 19, 2014. See Dkt. No.-1. In the Complaint, Furukawa alleges that Hossain unlawfull
Hossain v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mohammed Anowar Hossain petitions for review of the immigration judge’s (IJ) *160decision to deny his claims of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We omit the relevant facts as they are known to the parties. Hossain claims that he is el
American Transit Insurance v. Hossainpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn T. Sugarman, Special Ref.), entered on or about August 17, 2011, which found that proposed additional respondent State Farm is obligated to insure proposed additional respondent Stokely Braithwaite in connection with the claims made against Braithwaite by respondent, Mohammad S. Hossain, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the petition to stay the uninsured motorist arbitration, and otherwise affirmed,
ABU NASER HOSSAIN v. JMU PROPERTIES, LLCpublic domain
King, Senior Judge: Following a bench trial, appellants Profound Radiance, Inc. (“PRI”) and Abu Naser Hossain were found liable on a counter-claim and 3rd-party complaint for breaching a commercial lease, breaching a franchise agreement, and fraud, for which the trial court entered a $391,640.82 judgment in appellees’ favor. They now claim the trial court erred by denying their
Hossain v. U.S. Attorney Generalpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Balayet Hossain, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ’s decision denied asylum and withholding of removal.1 Our lawful power to interfere is highly limited. No reversible error has been shown; we deny the petition.