Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, FULTON, and CRISFIELD, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stephen P. HOWELL, Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Timothy Brian Howell appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Howell claims that the district court did not adequately explain why it declined to order a larger sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782.

Judge STUCKY, concurring in the result. I agree with Judge Sparks that the Government’s petition for the writ was not an interlocutory appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2012), that both the Court of Criminal Appeals and this Court have jurisdiction to consider the issue, and the action of paying Appellant at the E-l rate pending his rehearing did not amount to illeg

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before THE COURT EN BANC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID M. JONES LIEUTENANT COLONEL, U.S. MARINE CORPS MILITARY JUDGE STEPHEN P. HOWELL STAFF

ORDER Ollie Howell robbed three banks in Illinois during September 2012, two in Peoria (Heritage Bank and South Side Bank), and another in Aurora (Old Second National Bank). The following month he was charged by indictment with bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), but only for the South Side Bank robbery. He was not taken into custody in the Central District of Illinois, however, until after he was arrested in California in M

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before M.D. MODZELEWSKI, R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEPHEN P. HOWELL STAFF SERGEANT (E-6), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201200264 GENERAL C

*169Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark Allen Howell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the d

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donnie Keith Howell appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. Howell argues that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin Howell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Uni

606 F.3d 960 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Tyrone HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2650. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2010. Filed: June 8, 2010. *961 Douglas B. Altman, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant. Nancy E. Brasel, AUSA, Minneapo

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Leonard Howell appeals from his conviction imposed by the United States District Court for the *17Northern District of New York (McAvoy, «/.). Following a jury trial, Howell was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1) and 846. Howell was acquitted on on

531 F.3d 621 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William Thomas HOWELL, Appellant. No. 07-2446. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 14, 2008. Filed: July 7, 2008. *622 Ian A. Lewis, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO, argued (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public D

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Leonard Howell appeals from his conviction imposed by the United States District Court for the *17Northern District of New York (McAvoy, «/.). Following a jury trial, Howell was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1) and 846. Howell was acquitted on on

552 F.3d 709 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Matthew HOWELL, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Charles Edward Thomas, Appellant. Nos. 08-2126, 08-2171. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 22, 2008. Filed: January 13, 2009. *711 John

527 F.3d 646 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles C. HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-2118. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 21, 2008. Decided May 29, 2008. Joseph H. Hartzler (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Springfield, IL, Sara Darrow, Office of the United States Attorne

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Cordell Howell appeals his sentence of 235 months’ imprisonment following a plea of guilty to possession with the intent to distribute 5 or more grams of cocaine base (“crack”) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(B)(iii). For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the sentence imposed by the District Court. The only argument Ho

MEMORANDUM ** Tresha Howell appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence obtained during an inventory search of her rental car at the scene of a crash where she was rendered incapacitated and during a subsequent search of her residence, which served as the basis for her guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess and distribute methamphetamine pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and

MEMORANDUM ** Joel Antonio Howell appeals his jury conviction for being in possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We affirm. As the parties are already familiar with the facts of Howell’s arrest and conviction, we recount them only as necessary to our dispositio

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-2118 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C HARLES C. H OWELL, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central Di

ORDER Shayna Howell, a federal prisoner proceeding through counsel, appeals a district court judgment revoking her term of supervised release. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). On December 7, 1998, Howell pleaded guilty to one cou