⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Hurley”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. HURLEY C. JACKSON, Defendant‐Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 4× · 842 F.3d 170; 2016 WL 6892756; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21149
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Kyle Hurley pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute, and possess with the in *171 tent to distribute, controlled substances. Hurley stipulated to possession of 1,451.7 kilograms of synthetic cannabinoid product, which consisted of the chemicals XLR11 and AB-FUBINACA spra
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. HURLEY C. JACKSON, Defendant‐Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 71 M.J. 395; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 1021
CCA 20080262. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 26, 2012.
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 71 M.J. 408
CCA 20080262. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including October 11, 2012, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 171 F. App'x 700
MEMORANDUM** Appellant Cathy Ann Hurley (“Hurley”) appeals the district court’s dismissal, with*701out an evidentiary hearing, of her motion to vacate or correct her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a § 2255 motion. United States v. Rodrigues, 347 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir.2003).
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 96 F.3d 1456; 1996 WL 501627
96 F.3d 1456 U.S.v.Hurley*** NO. 95-3541 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 22, 1996 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla., No. 88-00331-CR-T-15B 2 AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995-07-24 · Published · cited 162× · 63 F.3d 1
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. The eight appellants challenge their convictions, sentences and forfeitures for their participation in an extensive money laundering operation organized by Stephen Saccoc-cia. His conviction and sentence were affirmed in United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754 (1st Cir.1995). In this case, we affirm the convictions of the eight appellants b
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-06-26 · Published · cited 4× · 601 B.R. 529
BRAND, Bankruptcy Judge: INTRODUCTION Appellant Paul Hurley appeals a summary judgment order in favor of the United States and Accesslex Institute, dba Access Group (together, "Defendants"). The bankruptcy court determined that, given Hurley's legal background and the nature of his criminal conduct, he was unable to establish good faith under
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion August 2, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1235 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion April 22, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] ___________________ No. 92-1068 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. VINCENT "MICKEY" HURLEY,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990-01-03 · Published · cited 0× · 894 F.2d 411; 1990 WL 3676
894 F.2d 411 U.S.v.Hurley** NO. 89-3240 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JAN 03, 1990 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990-01-04 · Published · cited 3× · 728 F. Supp. 66; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8973; 1990 WL 1735
728 F.Supp. 66 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Edmund M. HURLEY, David T. Gorwitz, Salvatore M. Caruana, Charles R. Burnett, Rubie M. Nottage, Kendal W. Nottage, Joseph J. Balliro. Cr. No. 89-0068-H. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 4, 1990. *67 Robert L. Ullmann, for U.S. Albert F. Cullen, Jr., C
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987-03-03 · Published · cited 0× · 812 F.2d 715
812 F.2d 715 U.S.v.Hurley 85-3174 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 3/3/87 1 D.Or. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 667 F.2d 1028
667 F.2d 1028 U. S.v.Hurley 80-5335 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 10/22/81 1 W.D.Tenn. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 71 F.3d 884; 1995 WL 707397
71 F.3d 884 U.S.v.Hurley Wells, Jr., William Leroy Wells, Jr. NO. 94-8076 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov 15, 1995 M.D.Ga., 66 F.3d 342 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 877; 126 S. Ct. 200
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 901
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 901; 125 S. Ct. 119
543 U.S. 901 HURLEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5464. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 452.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 929; 122 S. Ct. 291
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.