Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Hussein”
United States v. Husseinpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and FOIL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Amin T. HUSSEIN Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Cor
United States v. Husseinpublic domain
664 F.3d 155 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Naeil HUSSEIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-2248. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 5, 2011. Decided December 13, 2011. *157 David E. Bindi, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-
United States v. Husseinpublic domain
230 F.Supp.2d 109 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Abdigani HUSSEIN, Defendant No. CR. 02-25-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. October 31, 2002. *110 Jonathan R. Chapman, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Joseph H. Groff, III, Jensen, Baird, Ga
United States v. Husseinpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. A jury found defendant-appellant Abdi-gani Hussein guilty of knowingly possessing and intending to distribute khat, a plant naturally containing the chemical stimulant cathinone (a Schedule I controlled substance), in violation of section 841(a)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The district court refused to set aside the verdict and sentenced Hussein
United States v. Abdisalan Husseinpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1275 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Abdisalan Abdulahab Hussein, also known as Abdisalan A. Hussein
Hussein v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
United States v. Hussein Shehatapublic domain
68 F.3d 458 U.S.v.Hussein Shehata NO. 95-1450 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Sept 25, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 94-cr-00230-4 1 AFFIRMED.
United States v. Qais Husseinpublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. Qais Hussein and Majdi Odeh ran two convenience stores in southern Illinois where they sold counterfeit goods and illegally traded cash or ineligible items for food stamps. They also filed false tax returns on behalf of their businesses. They were eventually indicted in a four-count indictment and pleaded guilty to all counts. As part of the plea agreement
United States v. Husseinpublic domain
807 F.2d 997 **U.S.v.Hussein 85-8973 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 11/25/86 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------
KRUPANSKY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SUHRHEINRICH, J., joined. RYAN, J. (p. 647), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants Hussein Rahal and Haidar Rahal were middlemen in a miscarried contract killing of an individual who was to testify against figures in a heroin conspiracy in which Defenda
Hussein v. Whitakerpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Hussein v. Obamapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. Currently before the Court is Abdul Qader Ahmed Hussein’s (ISN 690)1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he argues that he should be released from the United States detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba because his detention is not statutorily authorized under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (
Hussein v. Statepublic domain
Smith, J. (concurring). I concur on constraint of Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York (86 NY2d 307 [1995] [CFE I]). This case, like CFE I, is based on allegations that the State is not adequately funding certain of its public schools, and thus is violating the Education Clause of the State Constitution (art XI, § 1: “The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and
Abou-Hussein v. Gatespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Hussein v. Ryanpublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Abou-Hussein v. Mabuspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Hamdy Alex Abou-Hussein, proceeding pro se, filed this action seeking relief for the alleged actions of his employer, the Department of the Navy, see Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 56-61, and unknown agents of the Naval Criminal Investigative Services (“NCIS”),
Sameh Hussein v. Robin Barrettpublic domain
OPINION BASTIAN, District Judge: Sameh Hussein, a lawful permanent resident, appeals the district court’s denial of his naturalization application. After a bench trial, which followed a decision adverse to Hussein by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (US-CIS), the district court concluded that Hussein failed to satisfy his statutory
Hussein v. Ryanpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States v. Ahmed Husseinpublic domain
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Ahmed Hussein appeals from a July 21, 1998 consent judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John F. Keenan, Judge) ordering him to pay the government $675,183.88 in outstanding liabilities for tax years 1983 and 1984. 1 Hussein’s princip
Abou-Hussein v. Gatespublic domain
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.