Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond Ibarra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S, 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ibarra has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant porti

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Hilberto Ibarra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ibarra has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. BRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE “Since controlled substances are often diluted and combined with other substances as they pass down the chain of distribution, the fact that a defendant is in possession of unusually pure narcotics may indicate a prominent role in the criminal enterprise and proximity to the source of the dru

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Jesus Ibarra-Diaz appeals from his conviction for possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)(viii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mr. Ibarra-Diaz asserts four claims of error on appeal: (1) the district court violated his Sixth Amendment confrontati

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Angel Ibarra-Servin appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Ibarra-Servin contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain adequately

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CARLOS MURGUIA, District Judge. Defendant Martin Gastelum Ibarra is charged with (1) possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine and (2) being an alien unlawfully in the United States after having been deported. The court recently denied defendant’s motion to suppress. The court held that the initial traffic stop of the vehicle in which de

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the district court1 is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, concurring in the judgment: As the majority recognizes, “the district court did not preclude the duress defense *1008prior to trial.” Maj. op. at 1004. The evidence it excluded — Ibarra’s post-arrest statements and his mother’s statements about what his wife said — were inadmissible hearsay. We have no occasion to discuss wh

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Valentin Ibarra-Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ibarra-Luna has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the district court1 is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

628 F.3d 712 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime IBARRA-LUNA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-40768. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 22, 2010. *713 Julia Bowen Stern, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def., M

MEMORANDUM ** Gerardo Ibarra-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ibarra*851Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Valentin Ibarra-Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ibarra-Luna has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

493 F.3d 526 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael Jesus IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-50783. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 19, 2007. *527 *528 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Mark Randolph Stelmach (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, TX, for U.S.

MEMORANDUM *** Antonio Ibarra-Lemus appeals his conviction in the District Court for the Eastern District of California for aiding and abetting, conspiracy, and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Ibarra-Lemus argues that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence and erred in denying his motion for release o

MEMORANDUM *** Antonio Ibarra-Lemus appeals his conviction in the District Court for the Eastern District of California for aiding and abetting, conspiracy, and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Ibarra-Lemus argues that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence and erred in denying his motion for release o

MEMORANDUM ** Following a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), Francisco Ibarra*635Valdez appeals from the district court’s order concluding that it would not have imposed a materially different sentence had it known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. We have jurisdiction pu

MEMORANDUM ** Santiago Ibarra appeals from the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and conspiracy to distribute *631methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Iba

517 F.3d 1218 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Loretto IBARRA-CORONEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2183. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 28, 2008. *1219 David N. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney (Larry Gómez, Acting United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Albuquerqu

MEMORANDUM ** Felipe Ibarra-Caloca appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ibarra-Caloca’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as coun