Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF VERDICT Anthony J. Trenga, United States District Judge On October 25, 2016, the Court found Defendant Muna Osman Jama (“Jama”) guilty on Counts One through Twenty-One of the superseding indictment and Defendant Hinda Osman Dhirane (“Dhirane”) guilty on Counts One and Sixteen through Twenty-One and not guilty on Counts Two through Fifteen of the supers

BAUER, Circuit Judge. This case introduces a new drug culture to the Seventh Circuit: the underground world of “khat.” Jama Mire and Hassan Rafle became involved in a conspiracy to distribute khat in the Indianapolis area. Mire’s business, the Somali House of Coffee, served as a place where people could get the “stuff”

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID D. DOWD, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Liban Muse Jama (“Jama”) filed suit challenging actions taken by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) which resulted in the initiation of removal proceedings against Plaintiff. These actions include (1) the termination of Jama’s refugee status, (2) the denial of his application to adjust status, and (3) the denial

343 F.Supp.2d 338 (2004) Hawa Abdi JAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SEVICE, et al., Defendants. Samson Brown, et al., Plaintiff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Esmor Correctional Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 97-3093(DRD), 98-1282(DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Same cases below, 369 Fed. Appx. 242.

334 F.Supp.2d 662 (2004) Hawa Abdi JAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Samson Brown, et al., Plaintiff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Esmor Correctional Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 97-3093(DRD), 98-1282(DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

22 F.Supp.2d 353 (1998) Hawa Abdi JAMA, Abu Bakar, Joseph Ackah, Charles Addai, Benjamin Anang, Dweku Awotowe, Yvetee Nsukami Badjoko, Gonzalo Crespo, Joseph Debrah, Cecilia Kou Jeffrey, Anantharajah Jeyakumar, Abraham Kenneh, Nagendran Manoharan, Thomas Kyeu Manu, Dennis Raji, Shamimu Nanteza, Agatha Serwaa, Jasmel Singh, Folorunsho Wasiu Alibi and Sarah Tetteh Yower, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Correctio

JUDGMENT The district court’s judgment ordering the release of petitioner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is reversed because the district court erred in concluding that “there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). The United States Supreme Court has granted certio-rari in Mr. Jama’s immigration case, and we bel

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. When an alien is found ineligible to remain in the United States, the process for selecting the country to which he will be removed is prescribed by 8 U. S. C. § 1231(b)(2). The question in this case is whether this provision prohibits removing an alien to a country without the explicit, advance consent of that country’s government. I <

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.

DORRIAN, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Hanad S. Jama, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy. Because we conclude that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit retrial of appellant following the trial court's declaration of a mistrial, we affirm. I. Facts and Procedur

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P! WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This action arises out of the termination of the plaintiff, Stacie Selfridge, from her employment at Boston Home Health Aides, LLC (“Boston Home Health”), where she served as a manager and allegedly anticipated obtaining an ownership interest in the company. Selfridge seeks declaratory and monetary relief for unpaid compensation, emoti

[Cite as State v. Jama, 2018-Ohio-1274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 17AP-569 v. : (C.P.C. No. 08CR-11-8033) Shamso Jama, :

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1585 ___________________________ Abdirisak Dahir Jama, lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner, v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Liban A Jama seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies.1 The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

[Cite as Wallick Properties Midwest, L.L.C. v. Jama, 2021-Ohio-2830.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Wallick Properties Midwest, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-299 v. : (M.C. No. 2019 CVG 049542) Mahdi Jama,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2250 ___________________________ Abdullahi Jamale Jama Petitioner v. Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FAYSAL A. JAMA, on behalf of No. 22-35449 himself and all other similarly situated; JAMES KELLEY; ANYSA D.C. Nos. NGETHPHARAT, 2:20-cv-00454- MJP Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:20-cv-00652- MJP v. STATE FARM MUTUAL OPIN