Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “United States v. Jared Loughner”
United States v. Loughnerpublic domain
782 F.Supp.2d 829 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jared Lee LOUGHNER, Defendant. Case No. 11cr0187 TUC LAB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. May 5, 2011. *830 Beverly K. Anderson, Christina Marie Cabanillas, Dominic William Lanza, Mary Sue Feldmeier, Wallace Heath Kleindienst, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tucso
United States v. Loughnerpublic domain
807 F.Supp.2d 828 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jared Lee LOUGHNER, Defendant. Case No. 11cr0187 TUC LAB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. May 25, 2011. *829 Beverly K. Anderson, Bruce M. Ferg, Christina Marie Cabanillas, Mary Sue Feldmeier, Wallace Heath Kleindienst, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ,
United States v. Loughnerpublic domain
769 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jared Lee LOUGHNER, Defendant. Case No. 11cr0187 TUC LAB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 9, 2011. *1189 David Jeremy Bodney, Peter Shawn Kozinets, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Attorneys for Intervenors Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. and KPNX B
United States v. Loughnerpublic domain
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in all but Part III.B.3.d. of Judge BYBEE’s opinion and concurring in the judgment: I concur in the opinion and judgment and I join the excellent analysis in all sections except Part III.B.3.d. I do not join in the negative speculation that Loughner’s staff representative, John Getehell, was unqualified or that Getchell’s performance was procedurally defective.
United States v. Loughnerpublic domain
770 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jared Lee LOUGHNER, Defendant. Case No. 11cr0187 TUC LAB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 21, 2011. Beverly K. Anderson, Christina Marie Cabanillas, Mary Sue Feldmeier, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff. ORDER RE: COMPETENCY EXAM LARRY ALAN BURNS
State of Iowa v. Jonathan James Elphicpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0600 Filed January 28, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JONATHAN JAMES ELPHIC, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Franklin County, Peter B. Newell, District Associate Judge. A defendant contends his guilty plea to harassment in the first degree
Palin v. The New York Times Companypublic domain
17‐3801‐cv Palin v. The New York Times Company 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 ________ 6 7 AUGUST TERM, 2018 8 9 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2018 10 DECIDED: AUGUST 6, 2019 11 AMENDED: OCTOBER 15, 2019 12 13
Palin v. The New York Times Companypublic domain
John M. Walker, Jr. , Circuit Judge : This case is ultimately about the First Amendment, but the subject matter implicated in this appeal is far less dramatic: rules of procedure and pleading standards. Sarah Palin appeals the dismissal of her defamation complaint against The New York Times ("the Times") for failure to
Palin v. New York Times Co.public domain
22-558-cv Palin v. New York Times Co. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2023 ARGUED: NOVEMBER 6, 2023 DECIDED: AUGUST 28, 2024 No. 22-558 SARAH PALIN, Plaintiff–Appellant
Palin v. New York Times Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Nowhere is political journalism so free, so robust, or perhaps so rowdy as in the United States. In the exercise of that freedom, mistakes will be made, some of which will be hurtful to others. Responsible journals will promptly correct their errors; others will not. But if political journalism is to achieve its constitutionally endorsed role of challenging the po
George v. Morrispublic domain
TROTT, Circuit Judge, Concurring in small part and Disagreeing in large part: Mrs. George has been through a painful set of circumstances, and she deserves not to be subjected to these facts again and again. Nevertheless, with the advice of counsel, she has chosen to sue the deputies who responded to her emergency call, and they, too, are entitled to fair and proper treatment un
Carol George v. Jarrett Morrispublic domain
TROTT, Circuit Judge, concurring in small part and disagreeing in large part: Mrs. George has been through a painful set of circumstances, and she deserves not to be subjected to these facts again and again. Nevertheless, with the advice of counsel, she has chosen to sue the deputies who responded to her emergency call, and they, too, are entitled to fair and proper treatmen
Carol George v. Jarrett Morrispublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CAROL ANN GEORGE, No. 11-55956 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:09-cv-02258- CBM-AGR DEPUTY JARRETT MORRIS; DEPUTY JOSEPH SCHMIDT; DEPUTY JEREMY ROGERS, Defendants-Appellants. THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA; DEPUTY HARRY HUDLEY; DEPUTY LARRY HESS,