Cases

19-610-cr (L) United States v. Jenkins In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2021 Nos. 19-610-cr (L); 19-637-cr (Con), 19-2778-cr (Con) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANDRE JENKINS, AKA LITTLE BEAR, DAVID PIRK, TIMO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. THOMAS JENKINS, Case No. 17-cr-00233 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Thomas Jenkins is serving a 128-month prison sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin and methamphetamine. He is incarcerated at Federal

UN`ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 'i`HE DlSTRlCT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMER]CA, V- Criminal No. 06~cr-14l (CKK) ROBERT JENKINS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ()PINI_ON (June11,2018) Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Writ ofError Corcrm Nobis and Motion to Vacate Conviction, ECF No. 47, which was recharacterized by this Court as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C, Section 2255. See February 20, 2018 Memorandum Opinion and ()rder, ECF No

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Defendant Andre Jenkins‘(“Jenkins”) is one of 12 remaining defendants1 named in a 46-count Second Superseding Indictment (“Indictment”) ■ (Dkt. 33) returned on March 16, 2016, alleging various crimes, including a conspiracy in violati

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE [# 52, # 53, # 72 AND # 73] GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On March 31, 2016, the grand jury returned an Indictment against Defendant Marvin Jenkins, charging him with violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846; conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, Count I; aiding and abetti

ELLIS, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant, Antwon Jenkins, was arrested and charged with Kidnapping, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a), and Using or Carrying a Firearm to Commit a Federal Crime of Violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii).1 Following his arrest, Jenkins agreed to cooperate with the Government’s investigation of these crimes and give a proffer interview. Prior to the interview, the Government and

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

*702DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD * District Judge. . INTRODUCTION Pro se defendant Joseph Jenkins (“Defendant”) seeks appointment of counsel to assist with' his sentencing in the above matter, or alternatively he requests that sentencing be indefinitely suspended' until he

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD *, District Judge. BACKGROUND Defendant Joseph Jenkins (“Defendant”) is charged in a single-count indictment with perjury in violation of'18 U.S.C. § 1621(2). (Dkt. 2). The matter arises from a Criminal Justice Act Form 23, Financial Affidavit (“CJA Form 23”) allegedly completed by Defendant in connection with

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD * District Judge. BACKGROUND Defendant Joseph Jenkins (“Defendant”) is charged in a single-count indictment with perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621(2). (Dkt. 2). The matter arises from a Criminal Justice Act Form 23, Financial Affidavit (“CJA 23 Form”) allegedly completed by Defendant in connection wit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Crim. No. 01-0311 (TFH) GENO W. JENKINS, Petitioner. FILED JUL 10 2013

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luther Jenkins, IV seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A ce

ORDER Henry Jenkins appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce his prison sentence based on a retroactive change to the offense levels for crack-cocaine offenses. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district *602court correctly determined that there was no basis to reduce his sentence, and thus we affirm the judgment. Jenkins pleaded guilty to conspir

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zhivargo Kinta Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006).

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. On April 4, 2011, Anthony Ray Jenkins, David Jason Jenkins, Mable Ashley Jenkins and Alexis Leeann Jenkins, kidnapped Kevin Pennington. Without trial or due process, they sentenced him to a short period of detention in their truck followed by a beating on the mountains of Kingdom Come State Park. Ashley and Alexis claim they targeted Kev

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Jenkins appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for a show cause hearing and transport. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord

MEMORANDUM OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Every case begins with a story. Here, much of that story is uncontestéd. All agree that on a dark night, in the spring of 2011, Kevin Pennington was physically and brutally assaulted on a deserted road in Kingdom Come State Park by Jason and Anthony Jenkins. The jury saw photographs of Mr. Pennington’s injuries and heard the fear in his voice durin

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Though it would be an exceedingly rare occurrence for any person to physically assault another without as much as a fleeting trace of hate in his or her heart, Congress has seen fit to provide special federal protections against designated “hate crimes.” The United States alleges that when David Jenkins and Anthony Jenkins kidnapped

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. On February 14, 2012, the government filed an indictment charging defendant Arthur Jenkins with fourteen counts of theft of property of the United States, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 641. Specifically, the indictment alleged that on fourteen separate dates between August 3, 2010, and September 2, 2011, defendant “stole and converted to his own use an