Cases

Case: 18-14812 Date Filed: 12/23/2019 Page: 1 of 7 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14812 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00232-SDM-

KANNE, Circuit Judge. John Bums made fraudulent misrepresentations when soliciting investments for his employer, USA Retirement Services (“USARMS”). Burns told investors that he had experience managing investments and that he had personally invested in *683USARMS’s promissory notes. His statements were false. Moreover, without Burns’s knowledge, the investment opportu

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CO-0636 CARLTON HENDERSON, III, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CO-0636 CARLTON HENDERSON, III, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,

POOLER, Circuit Judge: The case before us treads on familiar ground-the fundamental protections for criminal defendants that are enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. Defendants-Appellees Rodshaun Black, Daniel Rodriguez, and Ernest Green (collectively, "Defendants-Appellees") were indicted on March 6, 2012, and charged with one count of Hobbs Act conspiracy. On March 7, 2012, prosecutors informed the district cour

USCA11 Case: 22-12798 Document: 68-1 Date Filed: 09/18/2024 Page: 1 of 25 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12798 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

18‐496‐cr (L) United States v. Black UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2018 (Argued: August 14, 2018 Decided: March 18, 2019) Docket Nos. 18‐496‐cr(L), 18‐548‐cr(XAP), 18‐574‐cr(XAP)

Before STEPHENS, HOUTZ, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Willie C. JETER Lieutenant Junior Grade (O-2), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201700248 Argued: 28 July 2021—Decided: 20 October 202

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1862 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. HOWARD JOHN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Indira Talwani, U.S. District Judge]

Reversed and remanded for resentencing and resentencing by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge KING joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge. After pleading guilty to drug trafficking, John Hudson was released on bond pending sentencing. Because of fear over the length of h

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1975 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN ADAMS, Appellant ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of P

MEMORANDUM OPINION JEAN K. FITZSIMON, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction The deposit funds of Plaintiffs Daniel and Caryn Black (the “Blacks” or the “Plaintiffs”) for the purchase of a home that they never occupied were not returned to them as promised. The Plaintiffs sued the Defendants’ company Gigliotti Avignon Associates, L.L.P. (“Gigliotti Avignon”) in state court and re

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2607 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN FEENEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2607 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN FEENEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

USCA11 Case: 21-11621 Document: 110-1 Date Filed: 08/17/2023 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11621 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901 to 16991, sets out a “comprehensive national system for the registration of’ “sex offender[s].” Id. § 16901. Notably, however, SORNA excludes from the definition of “sex offender” a subclass of individuals

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3121 ___________________________ Organization for Black Struggle; St. Louis A. Philip Randolph Institute; Greater Kansas City A. Philip Randolph Institute; National Council of Jewish Women, St. Louis; Missouri Faith Voices

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–1146 Submitted September 14, 2022—Filed November 4, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JOHN EDDIE HANES, III, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Jeffrey D. Bert (plea) and Joel W. Barrows (sentencing), Judges. A defendant who filed no motion in arrest of judgment challenges, for the first time on direct appeal, the validity of his

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–1146 Submitted September 14, 2022—Filed November 4, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JOHN EDDIE HANES, III, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Jeffrey D. Bert (plea) and Joel W. Barrows (sentencing), Judges. A defendant who filed no motion in arrest of judgment challenges, for the first time on direct appeal, the validity of his

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0052p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap