Cases

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Rogers, Circuit Judge: *1031 On October 22, 2016, AT&T Inc. announced a proposed merger with Time Warner Inc. The government sued to enjoin this vertical merger under Section 7 of the Clayton Act,

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Judge Thacker joined. WYNN, Circuit Judge: A law enforcement officer knowingly lied to Defendant Kenneth Rush by claiming that he had a warrant to search the apartment where Defendant was staying when no warrant in fact existed. The district court held t

378 F.3d 230 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Trevor JOHNSON, Robert Carnes and Daniel Hunter, a.k.a. Tybome, Defendants-Appellants,Dennis McCall, a.k.a. B-Boy, Eric Mulder, a.k.a. Unique, Defendants. No. 02-1444. No. 02-1496. No. 02-1504. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 10,

MEMORANDUM OPINION HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on two sets of petitions by non-defendant third parties to amend numerous forfeiture orders previously entered in this case, as well as motions by the United' States to strike those petitions. For the reasons set forth herein, the third-party petitions will be denied, and the Government’s motions will be granted

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO ENRIQUE RAMIREZ UMAÑA, a/k/a Wizard, a/k/a Lobo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judg

THOMAS, Chief Judge: *833In this petition for a writ of mandamus, the defendants ask us to direct the district court to dismiss a case seeking various environmental remedies. The defendants argue that allowing the case to proceed will result in burdensome discovery obligations on the federal government that will threaten the separation of pow

692 F.Supp.2d 1136 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard G. RENZI, James W. Sandlin, Andrew Beardall, Dwayne Lequire, Defendant. No. CR 08-212 TUC DCB (BPV). United States District Court, D. Arizona. February 18, 2010. *1138 Brian Matthew Heberlig, David Matthew Fragale, Reid Henry Weingarten, Henry Parker Vandyc

644 F.3d 349 (2011) Douglas B. STALLEY, On Behalf of the UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Appellant, v. MOUNTAIN STATES HEALTH ALLIANCE; Wellmont Health Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 10-5211, 10-5212. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 8, 2011. *350 ON BRIE

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge. Defendants Trevor Johnson, Roberts Carnes and Daniel Hunter were convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard Conway Casey, Judge) in 1998 for conspiring to commit extortion by use of actual or threatened force in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. See United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 98 (2d Cir.2001). The District Court

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

DYK, Circuit Judge. These appeals arise from two takings suits related to the 2009 bankruptcies of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”). The plaintiffs are former dealers of those companies whose franchises were terminated in the bankruptcies. The plaintiffs allege that these terminations constituted a taking because the government required them as a condition of its providing financial assistance

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Naomi A. Stinson appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. Ms. Stinson filed an amended complaint against 123 defen