Cases

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Upon sua sponte panel rehearing, we withdraw our prior opinion, United States v. Jones , 924 F.3d 219 (5th Cir. 2019), and substitute the following: Coy Jones was convicted by a jury of

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON , Circuit Judge : Coy Jones was convicted by a jury of possessing and conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. We hold that Jones's rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Samuel Velasco Gurrola ("Gurrola"), the leader of the Velasco Gurrola Criminal Enterprise (the "VCE"), appeals his conviction and sentence for three counts of conspiracy to kill in a foreign country and four counts of conspiracy to cause travel in foreign commerce in the commission of murder-for-hire. Finding no reversible error, we AF

MANION, Circuit Judge. Gustavo Nunez-Moron, a citizen of Mexico, sought cancellation of removal, waiver of inadmissibility, and adjustment of status based on alien-relative petitions from his wife, a United States citizen, and his father, a legal permanent resident. Concluding that Nunez was inadmissible because he had re-entered the United States after previously being removed, t

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00082-CR FREDERICK L. BROWN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 47,806-A Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion on Remand by Justice Stevens

43 So.3d 1080 (2010) SUCCESSION OF Lorena P. CALDARERA, et al. v. Reginald ZENO, et al. No. 2009-CA-1397. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 16, 2010. *1083 Joseph A. Barreca, and Charles E. Mchale, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Succession of Lorena P. Caldarera, et al. James E. Uschold, Jam

Schultheis, J. Pursuant to CrR 8.3(b), the trial court may dismiss a criminal prosecution when governmental misconduct prejudices the accused’s right to a fair trial. Alexander Martinez was charged as an accomplice to first *24degree assault and a number of other crimes. During trial, the State revealed evidence of an exculpatory nature that the defense claimed it had never

86 P.3d 1210 (2004) STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. Alexander MARTINEZ, Respondent. No. 21597-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel 4. March 25, 2004. As Amended on Reconsideration April 20, 2004. *1211 Kenneth L. Ramm, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Yakima, for Appellant. Lenell R. Nus

204 Cal.App.3d 682 (1988) 251 Cal. Rptr. 417 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARDO AGUAYO LEDESMA, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B023407. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. September 15, 1988. *685 COUNSEL Robert L. Sills, under appointment by the Court

Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. This action under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) 1 and the false advertising law (FAL) (§ 17500 et seq.) arises from Philip Morris USA, Inc.’s (Philip Morris) use of terms such as “Lights” and “Lowered Tar and Nicotine” in advertising

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV