Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

642 F.3d 1315 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex MAESTAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2204. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 28, 2011. *1316 Santiago E. Juarez, (Dennis W. Montoya, Montoya Law, Inc., Rio Rancho, New Mexico, with him on the briefs), Santa Cruz, New Mexico, for Defendant

*901C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 275; *902No. 04-7589. No. 04-8009. No. 04-8240. No. 04-8251. No. 04-8307. N

*901C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 275; *902No. 04-7589. No. 04-8009. No. 04-8240. No. 04-8251. No. 04-8307. N

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (

*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1395 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ ILARRAZA, a/k/a KAE-KAE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.

(Reported below: 250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 742); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250

(Reported below: 250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 742); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250 F. 3d 743); (250

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Upon sua sponte panel rehearing, we withdraw our prior opinion, United States v. Jones , 924 F.3d 219 (5th Cir. 2019), and substitute the following: Coy Jones was convicted by a jury of

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON , Circuit Judge : Coy Jones was convicted by a jury of possessing and conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. We hold that Jones's rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated

ROBERT C. BRACK, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant Petrona Gaspar-Miguel's appeal from the judgment and conviction entered by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth on August 27, 2018. (Doc. 35.) Defendant was found guilty of illegal entry without inspection in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge On August 2, 2012, defendant Mario Ernesto Villanueva Madrid (“Villanueva”) pled guilty to Count One of Superseding Indictment 02 CR 416, which charged him with conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1956(h). (Dkt. No. 47.) On June 28, 2013 the Court imposed a sentence of one hundred thirty one (131) months of im

MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the United States’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Questioning of Government Witnesses Regarding Personal Information and Request for Anonymous Testimony, filed June 26, 2015 (Doc. 86)(“Anonymity MIL”); and (ii) the United States’ Amended Motion in Limine for Pretrial Rule E

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASTEL, District Judge. Defendant Saul Caballero entered a plea of guilty to participating in two drug conspiracies. He now awaits sentencing and objects to an aggravating role enhancement under section 3B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines. Caballero argues that because a leadership or managerial enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines would render him ineligible for the “sa

WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Appellants Christian Fernando Borda and Alvaro Alvaran-Velez challenge the outcome of a jury trial finding them guilty under 21 U.S.C. §§ 959, 960, 963 of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine knowing and intending that the cocaine would be unlawfully im *1051 <

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: After trial by jury, Ramon Cobena Duenas was convicted of conspiring to exchange counterfeit currency, and dealing in counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 473. On appeal, Cobena Duenas challenges his convicti

Case: 18-14812 Date Filed: 12/23/2019 Page: 1 of 7 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14812 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00232-SDM-