Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Kaigler”
United States v. Kaiglerpublic domain
109 F.Supp.2d 736 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence M. KAIGLER and Patsy D. Kaigler, Defendants. No. 1:99CV1345. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 31, 2000. *737 Annette G. Butler, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, Joseph L. Meadows, Department of Justice Tax Division
United States v. Kaiglerpublic domain
109 F.Supp.2d 732 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence M. KAIGLER and Patsy D. Kaigler, Defendants. No. 1:99CV1345. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 31, 2000. Annette G. Butler, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, Joseph L. Meadows, Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for United States of Ame
State v. Kaiglerpublic domain
Pietrykowski, Judge. {¶ 1} Desmond E. Kaigler, appellant, appeals his sentence in the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas on his conviction of attempted grand theft, a violation of *758R.C. 2923.02 and 2913.02(A)(1) and (B)(2) and a fifth-degree felony. Appellant pleaded no contest to the offense. In a judgment filed on July 23, 2010, the court sentenced appellant to i
08/31/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2017 Session ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KAIGLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 43913 James G. Martin, III, Judge ___________________________________
People v. Kaiglerpublic domain
Kelly, J. (concurring). The record does not disclose that Recorder’s Court Judge George Murphy committed error in denying defendant’s motion to suppress or that the trial judge, Recorder’s Court judge John P. O’Hara, erred in finding, in his opinion on motion for new trial, that: “In view of the permission given by the defendant with his attorney’s approval, the entry could not have been illegal or unreasona
Kaigler v. Gibsonpublic domain
SIBLEY, District Judge. Kaigler, as trustee in bankruptcy of L. E. Gibson, brought a plenary suit in equity in the District Court against Mrs. F. D. Gibson and a bank for the recovery of certain money on deposit in her name and an automobile in her possession. The petition alleges that the money in bank and that with which the automobile was bought was inherited by the bankrupt from his mother, Mrs. J. E. Gibson, at her death abo
Geiger v. Kaiglerpublic domain
The opinion of the court, was delivered by McGowAN, A. J. This was an action for the possession of a tract of land (Chappell) in Richland county. The complaint states that Henry J. Geiger, the elder, died in October, 1858, seized and possessed of the land, and that he left a will, of which Alexander Geiger was appointed executor, and in which the plaintiffs, his only children, were named as the beneficiaries. That
Geigers v. Kaiglerpublic domain
The opinion of the Court was delivered by McIver, A. J. This action' was brought to foreclose a mortgage of real estate given by the defendant to Alexander Geiger as executor of Henry J. Geiger, to secure the payment of the purchase money of a tract of land sold and conveyed by said Alexander Geiger, as executor as aforesaid, to the defendant. The plaintiffs are the heirs-at-law and devisees of Henry J. Geiger, an
United States v. David A. Wileypublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: David Wiley, the appellant, and Eugene Cunningham, a co-defendant, were arrested on March 17, 1971, in connection with an alleged sexual assault on the same date on twelve-year old Maxine Lewis. By a two-count indictment filed May 25, 1971, they were charged with carnal knowledge (22 D.C.Code § 2801) and taking indecent liberties with a minor child (22 D.C.
150 F.3d 1011 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8001 Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andKenneth Edwards; Nancy Edwards; Kathy Hancock; MichaelHancock; Lori Tuttle; Paul Alan Levy; NancyHuvendick; Center For Auto Safety,Intervenors-Appellants,v.CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andRobert Kempton, Plaintiff-Appellant,andGeorge Va
Ridgeway v. Acme Markets, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANDREA RIDGEWAY, § § No. 18, 2018 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. N16C-01-183 ACME MARKETS, INC., § FOX RUN SHOPPING CENTER, § LLC, and CIPOLLONI BROTHERS,
Surprenant v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authoritypublic domain
768 F.Supp.2d 312 (2011) Carol SURPRENANT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, Massachusetts Port Authority, and Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Civil Action No. 09-CV-10428-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 4, 2011. Decision Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Jud
Com. v. Bradley, P.public domain
J-A13008-20 2020 PA Super 183 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : PATRICK JOSEPH BRADLEY :
01/28/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 31, 2019 Session BONNIE HARMON, ET AL. v. HICKMAN COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Hickman County
State v. Bishoppublic domain
McClendon, j. ^Defendant, James A. Bishop, was charged by indictment with four counts of first degree murder, violations of LSA-R.S. 14:30. Kevin W. Kaigler and Frank N. Knight were charged in the same indictment with the same offenses. Defendant pled not guilty. Subsequently, the indictment was amended to reduce the charges against Knight to accessory after the fact to first degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:25 and
Mark Stanalajczo v. Brandonn Perrypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0128p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MARK STANALAJCZO, │ Plaintiff-Appel
State v. Serignepublic domain
LANDRIEU, J., dissents and assigns reasons. |tFor the following reasons, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of Lionel Serigne’s conviction of aggravated rape and William Serigne’s convictions of forcible rape, sexual battery, and aggravated incest. This case involves sexual abuse of children perpetrated by the two defendants, who are brothers, upon female family members, be
Denishio Johnson v. Curtis Vanderkooipublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Denishio Johnson v. Curtis Vanderkooipublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Denishio Johnson v. Curtis Vanderkooipublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra