⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Kanatzar”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-12-05 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1070; 126 S. Ct. 819
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-24 · Published · cited 1× · 543 U.S. 1107; 125 S. Ct. 1010
543 U.S. 1107 KANATZARv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-6088. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 810; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases rem
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3376 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-06-07 · Published · cited 15× · 370 F.3d 810; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11076; 2004 WL 1237652
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. After the district court 1 denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an inventory search of the vehicle that he was driving, Jacob Kanatzar conditionally pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2)
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2018-04-03 · Published · cited 36× · 543 S.W.3d 582
Patricia Breckenridge, Judge Relators Dr. Patrick Goldsworthy, Dr. Aston Goldsworthy and Patrick Goldsworthy D.C., P.C., ("doctors") seek a writ from this Court prohibiting the respondent, the Honorable James F. Kanatzar, from taking any action other than granting their motion to dismiss the underlying wrongful death suit as barred by the statute of limitations. Specifically, the doctors assert the plaintiffs' wrongful death claims
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1098
*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <
District Court, D. Kansas · 2014-01-31 · Published · cited 1× · 994 F. Supp. 2d 1211; 2014 WL 349735; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12085
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Yahoo Email Search Warrant (Doc. 19) and Motion to Suppress Residential Search Warrant (Doc. 20). After an evidentiary hearing on December 11, 2013, The Court took these motions under advisement, giving the parties until December 20, 2013 to file supplemental briefs. Havi
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-05-07 · Published · cited 4× · 750 F.3d 982; 2014 WL 1797383; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8557
RILEY, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Jason Hill of knowingly receiving and distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), (b)(1) (Count 1) and knowingly possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), (b)(2) (Count 2). Hill appeals, arguing the district court 1 erred in
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-11-16 · Published · cited 61× · 625 F.3d 466; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23599; 2010 WL 4608618
625 F.3d 466 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gabriel MANGUM, Appellant. No. 10-1640. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 24, 2010. Filed: November 16, 2010. *467 JoAnne M. Lilledahl, AFPD, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Robert L. Teig, AUSA, argued,
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-02-05 · Published · cited 16× · 594 F.3d 589; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2440; 2010 WL 395210
594 F.3d 589 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael B. GUIHEEN, Appellant. No. 09-1652. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 18, 2009. Filed: February 5, 2010. *590 Ian A. Lewis, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO, argued (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009-11-10 · Published · cited 3× · 669 F. Supp. 2d 629; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105361; 2009 WL 3787198
669 F.Supp.2d 629 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Ryan Pal CAUTHEN. No. 1:09CR218-1. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. November 10, 2009. *630 Terry Michael Meinecke, U.S. Attorney's Office, Greensboro, NC, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 09-1652 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 202 F. App'x 332
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Appellant Edward Paul
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006-03-10 · Published · cited 89× · 439 F.3d 1263; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5982; 2006 WL 574420
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Stephen Grimmett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence retrieved pursuant to a warrant to search his home based on information that he possessed and produced child pornography. Mr. Grimmett also challenges the constitutionality of one statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. § 2251, which criminalized that production
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006-02-14 · Published · cited 4× · 415 F. Supp. 2d 50; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6415; 2006 WL 397474
415 F.Supp.2d 50 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Frank BEST. No. 3:05CR222 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 14, 2006. *51 Kevin J. O'Connor, Peter S. Jongbloed, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, Stephen Benjamin Reynolds, U.S. Attorney's Office, Bridgeport, CT, for United States of America.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007-04-25 · Published · cited 52× · 483 F.3d 711; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11124; 2007 WL 1207081
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-Appellant Ray Andrus was indicted on one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). Agents of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) found pornographic images of children on Andrus’ home computer after An-drus’ father, Dr. Bailey Andrus, consented to a search of the Andrus home and An-drus’ comput
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3555 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Cour
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-05-17 · Published · cited 21× · 407 F.3d 942; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10601; 2005 WL 1149775
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Mark Hallam was convicted of two counts of possessing a firearm while being a felon and unlawful user of a controlled substance in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (3). The firearms at issue were discovered and seized during two searches, separated by several months, that were conducted at Mr. Hallam’s home pursuant to state search warra
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3681 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 371 F.3d 415; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11402; 2004 WL 1274336
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Joseph K. Johnston pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of destructive devices in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, *417 5861(d), and 5871. The district court 1 imposed concurrent sentences of forty-six months’ i