Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Kanatzar”
Kanatzar v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kanatzar v. United Statespublic domain
543 U.S. 1107 KANATZARv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-6088. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 810; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases rem
United States v. Jacob Kanatzarpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3376 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri
United States v. Jacob A. Kanatzarpublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. After the district court 1 denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an inventory search of the vehicle that he was driving, Jacob Kanatzar conditionally pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2)
State ex rel. Goldsworthy v. Kanatzarpublic domain
Patricia Breckenridge, Judge Relators Dr. Patrick Goldsworthy, Dr. Aston Goldsworthy and Patrick Goldsworthy D.C., P.C., ("doctors") seek a writ from this Court prohibiting the respondent, the Honorable James F. Kanatzar, from taking any action other than granting their motion to dismiss the underlying wrongful death suit as barred by the statute of limitations. Specifically, the doctors assert the plaintiffs' wrongful death claims
Meza v. United Statespublic domain
*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <
United States v. Deppishpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Yahoo Email Search Warrant (Doc. 19) and Motion to Suppress Residential Search Warrant (Doc. 20). After an evidentiary hearing on December 11, 2013, The Court took these motions under advisement, giving the parties until December 20, 2013 to file supplemental briefs. Havi
United States v. Jason Hillpublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Jason Hill of knowingly receiving and distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), (b)(1) (Count 1) and knowingly possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), (b)(2) (Count 2). Hill appeals, arguing the district court 1 erred in
United States v. Mangumpublic domain
625 F.3d 466 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gabriel MANGUM, Appellant. No. 10-1640. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 24, 2010. Filed: November 16, 2010. *467 JoAnne M. Lilledahl, AFPD, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Robert L. Teig, AUSA, argued,
United States v. Guiheenpublic domain
594 F.3d 589 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael B. GUIHEEN, Appellant. No. 09-1652. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 18, 2009. Filed: February 5, 2010. *590 Ian A. Lewis, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO, argued (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public
United States v. Cauthenpublic domain
669 F.Supp.2d 629 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Ryan Pal CAUTHEN. No. 1:09CR218-1. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. November 10, 2009. *630 Terry Michael Meinecke, U.S. Attorney's Office, Greensboro, NC, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
United States v. Michael Guiheenpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 09-1652 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United
United States v. Wilsonpublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Appellant Edward Paul
United States v. Grimmettpublic domain
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Stephen Grimmett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence retrieved pursuant to a warrant to search his home based on information that he possessed and produced child pornography. Mr. Grimmett also challenges the constitutionality of one statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. § 2251, which criminalized that production
United States v. Bestpublic domain
415 F.Supp.2d 50 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Frank BEST. No. 3:05CR222 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 14, 2006. *51 Kevin J. O'Connor, Peter S. Jongbloed, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, Stephen Benjamin Reynolds, U.S. Attorney's Office, Bridgeport, CT, for United States of America.
United States v. Ray Andruspublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-Appellant Ray Andrus was indicted on one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). Agents of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) found pornographic images of children on Andrus’ home computer after An-drus’ father, Dr. Bailey Andrus, consented to a search of the Andrus home and An-drus’ comput
United States v. Joseph Johnstonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3555 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Cour
United States v. Mark Allen Hallampublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Mark Hallam was convicted of two counts of possessing a firearm while being a felon and unlawful user of a controlled substance in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (3). The firearms at issue were discovered and seized during two searches, separated by several months, that were conducted at Mr. Hallam’s home pursuant to state search warra
United States v. Mark Allen Hallampublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3681 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
United States v. Joseph K. Johnstonpublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Joseph K. Johnston pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of destructive devices in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, *417 5861(d), and 5871. The district court 1 imposed concurrent sentences of forty-six months’ i